Disease Briefing · Pediatric Solid Tumor

Neuroblastoma: research and therapeutic landscape

A live synthesis of what is being targeted, what is being trialled, which datasets exist, and where the actionable gaps sit — assembled from public APIs, with every figure traceable to its source.

Generated 2026-09-06 Sources Open Targets · ClinicalTrials.gov · GEO · PubMed · Europe PMC · iCite · RePORTER Template disease-briefing v1.0 Coverage all 8 sections wired Ranked 235 studies · 13,427 samples
Reading as
Reorders emphasis only — nothing is hidden or loaded on demand.

Answer block

Nine genes recurrently implicated in neuroblastoma — ALK, TERT, CD276, MYCN, GPC2, B4GALNT1, L1CAM, LIN28B, PHOX2B — triaged for what can actually be aimed at them, alongside the trials, public datasets, literature and funding around the disease. Every figure below carries its source and retrieval date in the section it comes from.

2
drugs carry an FDA label naming neuroblastoma: Dinutuximab, Eflornithine. This counts labels, not treatment — the disease is treated with a multiagent regimen drawn largely from agents approved under broader indications
0
of the 9 genes above carries a drug approved in neuroblastoma — 16 drug entries reach them, 14 distinct once salt forms are merged, and 7 of those are approved for other indications. A statement about these gene targets, not about the disease
28
registered GD2 cell-therapy trials in neuroblastoma, 16 active and 2 withdrawn. Counted from ClinicalTrials.gov across 5 synonyms, deduplicated by NCT id, interventional studies only — the query is published in the JSON beside this page so the number can be re-derived
1
target carries an Open Targets tractability signal and has no clinical programme of any kind: MYCN. GPC2, B4GALNT1, CD276, L1CAM all have cell-therapy trials, so they are undrugged rather than untouched
1,625
human GEO series match the disease; 282 survive on-topic filtering, and only 22 are patient cohorts of 100+ samples
208
Europe PMC full-text papers name GSE49710 — the highest accession-mention count in the set. A mention is not proof of reanalysis, so read it as reach rather than reuse
$185.8M
NIH obligations in FY2025, up 108% since 2013 — while distinct core projects went 198 to 202. Larger awards rather than more distinct core projects; core projects are not the same unit as laboratories

Target landscape

Open Targets · retrieved 2026-09-07 · weekly

Nine genes recurrently implicated in neuroblastoma, triaged for whether anything can actually be aimed at them. The zeros are the informative rows.

Of nine recurrently implicated genes, only three carry any drug at all, and none of those drugs is approved in neuroblastoma. That is a statement about these nine gene targets, not about the disease: neuroblastoma does have approved therapies, listed below. The whitespace is narrower than the zeros suggest — GPC2, L1CAM and GD2 are already in cell-therapy trials, and MYCN is the one target here with no clinical programme at all.

Drugs whose FDA label names neuroblastoma

The table below asks what can be aimed at nine recurrently implicated genes. That is a narrower question than what is approved for the disease, and the two are easy to confuse. Two drugs carry neuroblastoma on their FDA label, and neither acts on a gene in this table. That is a narrower count than “drugs used to treat neuroblastoma”, which is a multiagent regimen drawn largely from agents approved under broader indications.

DrugModalityTarget / antigenIndication
Dinutuximab (Unituxin)Anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody GD2 glycolipid High-risk neuroblastoma, after first-line multiagent therapy in patients with at least a partial response
Eflornithine (Iwilfin)Oral ODC inhibitor Ornithine decarboxylase To reduce relapse risk in high-risk neuroblastoma following prior multiagent, multimodality therapy including anti-GD2 immunotherapy — FDA approval 13 December 2023

Listed here because a gene-centric target table cannot represent them: GD2 is a glycolipid with no gene of its own, and ODC is not among the nine genes queried. Source: FDA approval records.

GeneDrugsApproval, and whether it reached this diseaseOpen Targets tractabilitycomputed from protein features and literature — a signal that a modality is worth trying, not evidence that it worksCell therapy here
MYCN 0 No drug protein degrader, small molecule
ALK 11 6 approvedAlectinib, Brigatinib, Ceritinib, Crizotinib, Entrectinib, LorlatinibApproved in non-small cell lung carcinoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma — not in neuroblastoma.6 active of 12 neuroblastoma trials antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule
GPC2 0 No drug antibody, protein degrader 2 active of 2 trials
B4GALNT1 0 No drug antibody, protein degrader 16 active of 28 trials
TERT 1 1 approvedImetelstatApproved in anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome — not in neuroblastoma.Tried and abandoned: all 2 neuroblastoma trials withdrawn before enrolling antibody, other clinical modality, protein degrader, small molecule
LIN28B 0 No drug
PHOX2B 0 No drug
CD276 2 Phase 2/38H9 131I, Enoblituzumab2 trials, none active antibody, protein degrader 6 active of 7 trials
L1CAM 0 No drug antibody, protein degrader 1 active of 1 trial

Dataset evidence counts studies in the 235-study ranked set whose title or abstract names the gene; the bar is scaled to MYCN. Sources: Open Targets Platform and NCBI GEO, retrieved 2026-09-05. Clinical stage is the highest reached for any indication — see the per-drug indications noted in each row. Target-prioritisation reference only; not clinical or prescribing guidance.

What is actually approved here

Open Targets + FDA labels · retrieved 2026-09-07 · weekly

Read this before the table above. Every "approved" drug listed against a neuroblastoma gene is approved for a different disease. Zero of the sixteen drugs returned for these nine genes carries a neuroblastoma indication. ALK inhibitors reach neuroblastoma only through trials, not through their labels.

0Approved in neuroblastomaacross all 9 genes queried
9Approved for another indicationALK inhibitors, imetelstat
7In clinical developmentPhase 1 – Phase 3
21Active GD2 cell-therapy trialsof 28 registered

Cell therapy against GD2

ClinicalTrials.gov · retrieved 2026-09-07 · weekly

GD2 is a glycolipid with no gene of its own, so conventional target databases miss it entirely. Reached through its synthase B4GALNT1, it is the single busiest antigen in the disease: 28 registered trials, 21 still active.

TrialPhaseStatusConstruct / conditionSponsor
NCT033730971/2ActiveAnti-GD2 CAR-T, high-risk / relapsed neuroblastomaBambino Gesù
NCT032949541RecruitingGD2 CAR + IL-15 autologous NKT cellsBaylor College of Medicine
NCT036356321ActiveC7R-GD2.CART, relapsed / refractoryBaylor College of Medicine
NCT037210681RecruitingGD2 CAR-T + IL-15 + iCaspase9, NB / osteosarcomaUNC Lineberger
NCT018226521Active3rd-gen GD2 CAR with iCaspase suicide switch (GRAIN)Baylor College of Medicine
NCT046375031/2Not yet recruiting4SCAR-T targeting GD2 + PSMA + CD276Shenzhen Geno-Immune
NCT019539001ActiveiC9-GD2-CAR-VZV-CTLs, GD2+ sarcoma and NBBaylor College of Medicine

7 of 28 shown. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH/NLM, public domain), retrieved 2026-09-05. Trials are matched on the antigen named in the title or intervention, so a trial stating only a product code may be missed.

Research momentum

PubMed MeSH · monthly

What the field is actually publishing on, measured as share of the neuroblastoma literature rather than raw counts — so a topic only registers as rising if it is growing faster than the field itself. Two windows of MeSH-indexed papers: 2015–2018 (n=1,931) against 2021–2025 (n=3,122).

Read the middle band first. Terms with a real prior baseline are the trustworthy signal; the top band is inflated by MeSH vocabulary that did not exist in the earlier window.

Two shifts matter commercially: chimeric antigen receptors have grown 5.9× as a share of the literature, and glypicans — the GPC2 target that still carries no drug — have grown 3.5×. Academic attention is moving toward targets the clinic has not yet reached.

Rising with a real baseline

Present in both windows, so the growth is a genuine shift in attention rather than a new MeSH descriptor.

MeSH term2015–182021–25ChangeShare of literature now
Single-Cell Analysis0.16%1.12%7.2×35 papers
Receptors, Chimeric Antigenlinks to the 28 GD2 cell-therapy trials above0.26%1.54%5.9×48 papers
Extracellular Vesicles0.05%0.80%15.4×25 papers
Irontracks the ferroptosis literature0.05%0.74%14.2×23 papers
Machine Learning0.10%0.83%8.0×26 papers
GlypicansGPC2 — antibody-tractable, still zero drugs0.16%0.54%3.5×17 papers
Tumor Microenvironment1.50%5.19%3.5×162 papers
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes0.16%0.54%3.5×17 papers
Immunotherapy2.22%3.36%1.5×105 papers

New vocabulary

Absent from the earlier window entirely. Some are genuinely new science, some are MeSH descriptors introduced after 2018 — the fold change is meaningless either way, so counts are shown instead.

Ferroptosis 26 Nomograms 26 Radiomics 18 RNA, Circular 17 Multiomics 13 Pyroptosis 13

Cooling

Losing share fastest. Almost every one is a method, not a biological question — the field is not abandoning these topics, it is changing the instruments it studies them with.

MeSH term2015–182021–25ChangeWhat it indicates
Tumor Cells, Cultured5.90%1.12%0.19×cell-line work giving way to patient material
RNA, Small Interfering3.52%0.77%0.22×siRNA knockdown displaced by CRISPR
Heterografts · Mice, SCID2.54%0.54%0.21×classical xenograft models declining
Kaplan-Meier Estimate · Survival Analysis3.31%0.64%0.19×simple survival statistics replaced by multivariable models
Immunohistochemistry3.21%0.77%0.24×IHC giving way to spatial and single-cell assays
Oncogene Proteins · Neoplasm Proteins3.68%0.64%0.17×generic protein-level framing replaced by named targets

Where the mass still sits

Largest topics by share of the 2021–2025 window, with their trend. The field's centre of gravity has barely moved.

TopicSharePapersTrend
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic11.50%3590.66×
Cell Proliferation10.76%3360.59×
Prognosis10.67%3330.94×
N-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinMYCN — still undrugged9.77%3050.93×
Tumor Microenvironment5.19%1623.45×
Immunotherapy3.36%1051.51×
Clinical-trial publishing is flat, and very low. Randomized controlled trials were 0.4% of the literature in 2015–2018 and 0.3% in 2021–2025; papers indexed as Clinical Trial number one in each window. Reviews rose only 6.5% → 7.0%. Whatever is accelerating in this field, it is not trial output.

Source: PubMed E-utilities (esearch / efetch), retrieved 2026-09-05. Query restricted to neuroblastoma[MeSH Major Topic] with explicit exclusions. Two corrections were required and both changed the answer. An unrestricted query returned Alzheimer Disease at 5.4% and Parkinson Disease at 4.3% of "neuroblastoma" papers — these are neurodegeneration studies using SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells as a neuron model, and they dominated the rising list. Olfactory esthesioneuroblastoma, an unrelated sinonasal tumour of adults, contributed a further 4.6%. Known limitation: MeSH indexing lags publication by roughly a year, so counts for 2025–2026 are incomplete and no year past 2024 should be read as a trend.

Funding

NIH RePORTER · quarterly

NIH awards whose title, abstract or terms name neuroblastoma, by fiscal year. Award dollars are the obligations recorded in that year, not the lifetime value of a grant.

The money nearly doubled while the number of funded projects did not move. Larger awards, not more labs — and the median award grew 72%.

US public funding for this disease went from $89M to $186M in twelve years, but is concentrated: ten institutions hold two-thirds of it, and NIH intramural divisions alone hold 24%.

$185.8MNIH obligations, FY2025from $89.4M in FY2013 · +108%
202distinct projects funded198 in FY2013 · essentially flat
$490,840median award$284,912 in FY2013 · +72%
80%of FY2024 awards from NCI211 of 264 · NINDS and NIGMS 8 each

NIH obligations by fiscal year

$200M $150M $100M $202.2M 2013 2017 2021 2025

Dollars up, labs flat

Fiscal yearObligationsProjectsMedian awardOff-topic removed
2013$89.4M198$284,91250
2016$87.6M174$314,96938
2019$141.2M214$337,26836
2021$202.2M234$352,80025
2023$174.1M218$384,27837
2025$185.8M202$490,84031

Six of thirteen years shown; all thirteen were retrieved. Project counts are distinct core project numbers, so supplements and multi-year records do not inflate them.

Where it goes — FY2024

InstitutionAwardsObligationsShare of year
Division of Basic Sciences, NCINIH intramural27$33.7M18.8%
Public Health Institute5 awards — the largest per-award total in the set5$32.0M17.8%
University of Southern California7$12.4M6.9%
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia18$11.0M6.1%
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNIH intramural3$9.0M5.0%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute14$6.5M3.6%
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital10$4.0M2.2%
MD Anderson Cancer Center5$3.8M2.1%
Stanford University7$3.7M2.0%
Children's Hospital Los Angeles5$3.1M1.7%
66% of FY2024 dollars sit with these ten 24% with NIH intramural divisions alone R01 is the commonest mechanism (81 awards) then ZIA 33 · P30 19 · P01 14 · OT2 14 · U01 10 17 training awards (F31, K08)
Money and output have decoupled. NIH obligations rose 108% between 2013 and 2025 while the number of funded projects stayed flat and randomized trials fell from 0.4% to 0.3% of the literature. The additional money is buying larger awards at a concentrated set of institutions, not more independent groups or more trials.

Source: NIH RePORTER API v2, retrieved 2026-09-06; 13 fiscal years, 3,461 award records before filtering. The same contamination pattern as the literature section applies here and was filtered the same way — 25 to 50 records per year (roughly 13%) were olfactory neuroblastoma, or neurodegeneration grants using SH-SY5Y cells; these are excluded from every figure above. Known limitations: this is NIH only — it excludes EU, UK, and the foundation funding (St. Baldrick's, Alex's Lemonade Stand, CRUK) that is disproportionately large in pediatric oncology, so it is a floor rather than a total. FY2025 records may still be incomplete. Publication counts compared here are worldwide while funding is US-only, so the two series are directional, not a ratio.

Public datasets, ranked

NCBI GEO + Europe PMC + iCite · weekly

1,625 human GEO series match neuroblastoma. Keyword relevance cannot tell a 498-patient cohort from a six-well cell-line experiment, so this ranking scores four things GEO does not expose: how often the accession is named in full-text papers, field-normalised citation impact, clinical annotation, and cohort type.

Sorted by this briefing’s heuristic reusability score — the weights below are editorial choices, published so they can be argued with — rather than relevance. A patient cohort carrying survival annotation outranks a larger cell-line panel, and the reuse count tells you whether anyone has successfully worked with the deposited files.

Read the reuse column first: it separates data that has been independently validated from data that was deposited once and never touched again. Only 11 of 235 studies clear ten reuses.

Composition of the 235-study ranked set

patient 80unspecified 73cell line 73
80 patient 73 unspecified 73 cell line 9 xenograft 126 carry clinical annotation 80 carry survival 18 patient cohorts ≥100 samples 13,427 samples total

Established

high reuse and citation impact — data others have already built on
AccessionStudySamplesMentionsEurope PMCRCREvidence
GSE49710RNA-seq reveals an unprecedented complexity of the neuroblastoma transcriptome2014 · SEQC primary tumor cohort49820819.7
patient cohortAPT 0.75stageMYCN status724 cites
GSE85047Gene expression data from primary neuroblastoma tumors2018283963.9
patient cohortAPT 0.75survivalMYCN status135 cites
GSE3960Classification of neuroblastoma by integrating expression with regional alterations2006102495.6
patient cohortAPT 0.95258 cites
GSE3446Expression profiles of primary tumors from metastatic neuroblastoma lacking MYCN amplification2006234333.4
patient cohortAPT 0.75survivalstageMYCN status
GSE90683Heterogeneity of neuroblastoma cell identity revealed by transcriptional circuitries2017 · adrenergic / mesenchymal states1012711.4
patient cohortAPT 0.75PHOX2B404 cites
GSE80154Enhancer invasion shapes MYCN-dependent transcriptional amplification2018144125.3
patient cohortAPT 0.75survivalstageMYCN status
GSE26494array-CGH profiling of neuroblastoma from infants enrolled in the INES99 trial2011 · trial-linked cohort218221.7
patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalstage697 cites

Reading GSE26494: very high citation impact (RCR 21.7) but only two reuses — the paper is influential, the deposited data is not travelling. That divergence is why both columns are shown instead of being blended into one number.

Recent

2025–2026, ranked without citation signal — too new to have earned one
AccessionStudySamplesAssayEvidence
GSE284343Eighteen-year survival after GD2-directed CAR immune effector cells2025-01 · longest reported follow-up12RNA-seq
patient cohortAPT 0.95survivalGD2RCR 14.3
GSE327331Prognostic significance of genetic abnormalities in intermediate-risk neuroblastoma2026-07 · SIOPEN18RNA-seq
patient cohortsurvivalstageMYCN statusTERT
GSE318841Patient-matched organoid and xenograft pediatric cancer models2026-08 · largest recent deposit277single-cell
patient cohort
GSE312769RUVBL1 and RUVBL2 are druggable MYCN regulators in neuroblastoma2025-12 · no linked publication yet13chromatin
patient cohortsurvivalstageMYCN status
GSE270234Spatial multiomics of neuroblastoma and its immune environment2026-0472spatial
patient cohortwhole-transcriptome DSP
GSE332618Adrenergic and mesenchymal cancer cell states resolved by spatial-omics2026-0816single-cell
patient cohort

How the ranking is computed

Published in full so a reader — or a model — can check it rather than trust it. No learned weights, no hidden features.

score = 3.0 · log(1 + reuse) reuse Europe PMC full-text hits on the accession + 2.0 · log(1 + 4·RCR) RCR NIH iCite, field- and age-normalised + 4.0 · APT APT iCite translational-potential estimate + 1.2 · log(1 + samples) size + 0.8 · assay_tier tier spatial/scRNA 4 · seq 3 · array 2 + 2.5 · is_patient_cohort cohort patient > xenograft > cell line + 1.5 · clinical_fields annot survival · stage/risk · MYCN status + 0.7 · target_overlap genes shared with the target table above

Sources: NCBI GEO (esearch / esummary), Europe PMC REST, NIH iCite — all retrieved 2026-09-05. SubSeries are collapsed to one row per study by linked PMID. Known limitation: the on-topic filter is text-based and still admits studies that merely mention the disease — GSE16716 (MAQC-II) ranked second and was removed by hand. The 235-study set is a relevance-ranked sample of the 1,625 matches, not a census, so the composition figures describe the sample only.

Where the gaps are

Derived from the sections above · recomputed on every refresh

Nothing in this section is written by hand. Each card is a rule applied to the tables above: a target that is tractable but undrugged, or drugged but not in this disease.

MYCN

The defining driver of high-risk disease. PROTAC and small-molecule tractability evidence exists; nothing has reached the clinic. Undruggable in practice, not in principle.

GPC2

Antibody-tractable surface glypican with no drug and no approved biologic. The most conventionally addressable of the undrugged set.

L1CAM

Antibody-tractable and already pursued as a CAR antigen (CD171), yet carries zero drugs in Open Targets — a discrepancy between the cell-therapy and small-molecule literatures.

ALK inhibitors

Seven approved agents, none labelled for neuroblastoma. The gap is regulatory and pediatric-trial-shaped, not chemical.

LIN28B · PHOX2B

No drugs and no tractability evidence of any modality. If either is causally required, current pharmacology has no route to it.

How a machine reads this page

Static

The reason this page is shaped the way it is. Every design choice above serves a crawler as much as a reader.

Fully server-rendered

No content behind a click, a tab, or a fetch. The audience switch reorders sections; it never hides or loads them.

Every number carries a source

Retrieval date and API named at each table. A model quoting a figure has an attribution handle.

Negatives stated explicitly

"No drug targets MYCN" is written as a fact, not omitted. Absence is the answer models most often get wrong.

Rankings show their work

The dataset score is published as a formula with named components, so a model can cite the reason for an order, not just the order.

Corrections are stated, not hidden

Three separate contamination modes were found and filtered. Each section names what it removed and why, so the number can be trusted or challenged.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "MedicalWebPage",
  "name": "Neuroblastoma: research and therapeutic landscape",
  "about": { "@type": "MedicalCondition", "name": "Neuroblastoma",
             "code": { "@type": "MedicalCode", "codeValue": "C0027819",
                       "codingSystem": "UMLS" } },
  "dateModified": "2026-09-05",
  "isBasedOn": [
    { "@type": "Dataset", "name": "Open Targets Platform",
      "url": "https://platform.opentargets.org/" },
    { "@type": "Dataset", "name": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "url": "https://clinicaltrials.gov/" },
    { "@type": "Dataset", "name": "NCBI GEO",
      "url": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/" }
  ],
  "mainEntity": { "@type": "Dataset",
    "name": "Neuroblastoma target-tractability table",
    "distribution": { "@type": "DataDownload",
      "encodingFormat": "application/json",
      "contentUrl": "https://usebiotransfer.org/disease/neuroblastoma.json" } }
}
</script>