← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Subclonal evolution revealed by single-cell profiles of expressed mutations identifies adaptation mechanisms to immunotherapy in melanoma [bWTS]

GSE215962 Mus musculus (mouse) Single-cell RNA-seq 33 samples Submitted 2026/02/18 Platform GPL21103
At a glance

Single-cell RNA-seq · mouse · 33 samples

What it is
Single-cell RNA-seqGene activity measured in thousands of individual cells, so cell types can be told apart.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
33 samples: 11 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Stochastic modeling of single-cell gene expression adaptation reveals non-genomic contribution to evolution of tumor subclonesCell systems · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) arises from distinct subclonal expansion following genetic or epigenetic alterations, and profoundly influences how tumors response to their immune microenvironment. Tumor progression trees based on single-cell mutational profiles have made it possible to trace subclonal evolution; however, conventional tree-building methods can incorporate only a limited number of cells and mutations, restricting their application to larger single-cell data.
Read the full summary ↓
To investigate the effect of ITH on the therapeutic response of melanoma, we have developed Trisicell (https://trisicell.rtfd.io), a computational toolkit for scalable inference of mutational ITH through assessment of single-cell genomic variant data. By applying Trisicell to genetically matched mouse melanoma datasets, we found that expressed mutations are sufficient to effectively drive subclonal evolution. On single-cell, full-length RNA sequencing data of mouse melanoma from preclinical immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) studies, the analysis showed that the subtree-seeding mutations in the trees identified distinct subclones associated with a specific developmental state and neural crest lineage markers. Using the tree to trace cell lineages, we found that neoantigens depleted by ICB were predominantly expressed in minor subclones, suggesting that post-treatment recurrence is driven by immunoediting. Moreover, these neoantigens were enriched with those derived from frameshift mutations and mutated nuclear genes. Importantly, recurrently mutated genes in ICB-responding human melanoma exhibited the same features. We next used Trisicell to analyze single-cell, full-length RNA data of brain metastases (BM) from melanoma patients treated with ICB, and discovered that relapsing BM from ICB-responding patients exhibited subclones that also expressed a higher fraction of frameshift mutations and were associated with elevated levels of infiltrated T cells. Notably, they also exhibited more mutated HLA genes and expressed high level of the novel immune checkpoint HLA-G, a putative local immunosuppressive mechanism. In summary, applying Trisicell to single-cell transcriptomic analyses allowed us to identify novel features of ICB-responding melanoma neoantigens and distinct mechanisms for adapting to immunotherapy at different sites. These results have important implications for both melanoma evolution and target identification for immunotherapies, including ICB and cancer vaccines. This is the first study to trace subclonal evolution of neoantigens at single-cell resolution, demonstrating that Trisicell and our datasets represent important resources for the field.
Published in
Stochastic modeling of single-cell gene expression adaptation reveals non-genomic contribution to evolution of tumor subclones
Hirsch MG, Pal S, Rashidi Mehrabadi F et al. · Cell systems 2025 · PMID 39701099 · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2024.11.013
This dataset
Open GSE215962 in finder → Find more mouse RNA-seq datasets →
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

Series matrix ↓
2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE215962_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

All supplementary files ↗ Whole study · RAW.tar ↓
3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

Raw reads on ENA ↗

What the files usually look like: Single-cell studies usually ship their counts as 10x files (matrix.mtx, barcodes.tsv, features.tsv), an .h5 file, or an .rds / .h5ad object that Seurat or Scanpy can open. Look for those among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA891350 and SRA study SRP403102. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

NCBI GEO page ↗ Paper (PMID 39701099) ↗
Study design
11 conditions, mostly in triplicate
C1 ×3 C4 ×3 C8 ×3 C11 ×3 C12 ×3 C14 ×3 C15 ×3 C16 ×3 +3 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 33 samples.

How we read this: 11 replicated groups read from 33 sample titles; they account for 33 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.