Taxonomy of introns, their evolution, and the role of minor introns in stress response
RNA-seq (gene expression) · zebrafish · 16 samples
- What it is
- RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
- Organism
- Danio rerio (zebrafish)
- Samples
- 16 samples: 6 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
- Data you can get
- A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Read the full summary ↓
Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.
Processed table
The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.
Supplementary files
The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE216619_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).
Raw sequencing reads
The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.
What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.
Also filed as BioProject PRJNA894519. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.
Supports a case/control comparison: 2 samples read as cases, 6 as controls.
How we read this: 6 replicated groups read from 16 sample titles; they account for 16 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.
- GSM6684527 ZMcal_1 ZMcal
- GSM6684528 ZMcal_2 ZMcal
- GSM6684529 ZMcal_3 ZMcal
- GSM6684530 WTZMcal_1 WTZMcal
- GSM6684531 WTZMcal_2 WTZMcal
- GSM6684532 WTZMcal_3 WTZMcal
- GSM6684533 cal_1 cal
- GSM6684534 cal_2 cal
- GSM6684535 cal_3 cal
- GSM6684536 WTcal_1 WTcal
- GSM6684537 WTcal_2 WTcal
- GSM6684538 WTcal_3 WTcal
- GSM7475246 E14_wt_rep1 E14_wt
- GSM7475247 E14_wt_rep2 E14_wt
- GSM7475248 E14_mutant_rep1 E14_mutant
- GSM7475249 E14_mutant_rep2 E14_mutant
- GSE270486 Convergent evolution of scavenger cell development at vertebrate brain borders 6 samples shares evolution
- GSE325479 Comparative single-cell multiomic analysis reveals evolutionarily conserved and species-specific cellular mechanisms mediating natural retinal aging 62 samples shares evolution
Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.