← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Antagonism between H3K27me3 and genome-lamina association drives atypical spatial genome organization in the totipotent embryo [scDam&T-seq]

GSE218597 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 28 samples Submitted 2024/08/09 Platform GPL30172Platform GPL19057
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 28 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
28 samples: 28 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Antagonism between H3K27me3 and genome-lamina association drives atypical spatial genome organization in the totipotent embryoNature genetics · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
In this study, we profiled genome-Nuclear Lamina (NL) contacts during the first stages of mouse embryonic development. We discovered a remarkable cell-to-cell variability in NL-contacts at the 2-cell stage, which is particularly strong on the paternal allele. We additionally obtained single-cell profiles for H3K27me3, H3K9me3 and DNA accessibility at this stage, but did not observe the same large-scale variability.
Read the full summary ↓
The variability in NL-contacts did not appear to affect the transcription of underlying genes. Comparing NL-contact profiles with diverse histone modification profiles showed that large regions of typical NL-contacts are lost and instead are enriched for H3K27me3 during early development. To investigate the relationship between H3K27me3 and NL association, we used a conditional EED KO mouse model, which results in an absence of H3K27me3 during oocyte development and the early embryo. Profiling NL-contacts at the 2-cell stage in this system revealed that regions enriched with H3K27me3 in WT regain NL association in the EED maternal KO. In addition, the loss of H3K27me3 resulted in more similar NL association profiles on the maternal and paternal allele. Together, these results suggest that H3K27me3 antagonizes NL association and that the non-canonical broad H3K27me3 domains present in the early embryo may be responsible for the early-embryo specific loss of NL associations in these regions.
Published in
Antagonism between H3K27me3 and genome-lamina association drives atypical spatial genome organization in the totipotent embryo
Guerreiro I, Rang FJ, Kawamura YK et al. · Nature genetics 2024 · PMID 39284976 · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01902-8
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE218597_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA904384 and SRA study SRP409295. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
28 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 28 sample titles: 28 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.