← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Single-cell multiomic analysis identifies macrophage subpopulations in promoting cardiac repair

GSE225615 Mus musculus (mouse) Single-cell RNA-seq 48 samples Submitted 2024/09/06 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

Single-cell RNA-seq · mouse · 48 samples

What it is
Single-cell RNA-seqGene activity measured in thousands of individual cells, so cell types can be told apart.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
48 samples: 21 conditions, mostly in duplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Single-cell multiomic analysis identifies macrophage subpopulations in promoting cardiac repairThe Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Our study comprehensively investigated the epigenetic features of cardiac F4/80+CD45+ macrophages at 3 and 7 days after P1 and P10 MI at infarct, border, and remote zones of mouse hearts (IZ, BZ, and RZ) through single cell H3K27ac ChIP-seq. we identified 9 subclusters and analyzed their potential functions, cluster-specific enhancer features, and enrichment of cell-type specific transcription factors.
Read the full summary ↓
Surprisingly, we found intracluster epigenetic heterogeneity exists with biological functions. Moreover, we identified two MI-responsive lineages and targeted one inflammatory lineage exhibiting obvious pre-regenerative function.
Published in
Single-cell multiomic analysis identifies macrophage subpopulations in promoting cardiac repair
Fu M, Jia S, Xu L et al. · The Journal of clinical investigation 2024 · PMID 39190625 · doi:10.1172/JCI175297
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE225615_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Single-cell studies usually ship their counts as 10x files (matrix.mtx, barcodes.tsv, features.tsv), an .h5 file, or an .rds / .h5ad object that Seurat or Scanpy can open. Look for those among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA936797 and SRA study SRP423452. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
21 conditions, mostly in duplicate
P1_MI_7D_IZ ×2 P1_MI_7D_BZ ×2 P1_MI_7D_RZ ×2 P1_Sham_7D_IZ ×2 P1_Sham_7D_BZ ×2 P1_Sham_7D_RZ ×2 P10_MI_3D_IZ ×2 P10_MI_3D_BZ ×2 +19 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 42 samples.

How we read this: 21 replicated groups read from 48 sample titles; they account for 42 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 8 more — browse all 48 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.