← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Mono and biallelic inactivation of Huntingtin gene in patient-specific iPS cells reveal HTT roles in striatal development and in neuronal functions impaired in Huntington’s disease

GSE228254 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 31 samples Submitted 2024/05/22 Platform GPL17303
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 31 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
31 samples: 31 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Mono- and Biallelic Inactivation of Huntingtin Gene in Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Reveal HTT Roles in Striatal Development and Neuronal FunctionsJournal of Huntington's disease · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Mutations in the Huntingtin (HTT) gene cause Huntington disease (HD), a neurodegenerative disorder. While HTT is known to be involved, as a scaffold protein, in several cellular functions, its normal and pathogenic functions during the development of the human forebrain remain poorly understood. To investigate the roles of wild-type and mutant HTT alleles during human neural and striatal development we inactivated HTT alleles in a series of isogenic clones of a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line derived from a patient with HD.
Read the full summary ↓
We show that the loss of wild-type, mutant, or both HTT isoforms did not affect the pluripotency of iPSCs or their transition into neural cells. However, we observed that HTT loss caused division impairments in forebrain neuro-epithelial cells. Moreover, HTT-/- derivatives displayed impaired maturation of medium spiny neurons (MSNs) particularly in the acquisition of DARPP32 expression, a key functional marker of MSNs. Finally, we discovered that MSNs and cortical neurons derived from HTT-/- clones exhibited higher levels of baseline DNA damage and lower BDNF axonal transport, two cellular dysfunctions previously described in HD neurons.
Published in
Mono- and Biallelic Inactivation of Huntingtin Gene in Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Reveal HTT Roles in Striatal Development and Neuronal Functions
Louessard M, Cailleret M, Jarrige M et al. · Journal of Huntington's disease 2024 · PMID 38427495 · doi:10.3233/JHD-231509
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE228254_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA949142 and SRA study SRP429475. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
31 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 31 sample titles: 31 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.