← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Methylomic and transcriptomic differences in treatment-naïve profiles among black and non-Hispanic white (NHW) women [RNA-Seq]

GSE240929 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 66 samples Submitted 2025/01/01 Platform GPL20301
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 66 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Topic
Ovarian cancerThis series is part of our curated briefing on it.
Samples
66 samples: 36 × B vs 30 × WGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Comparative transcriptomic, epigenomic and immunological analyses identify drivers of disparity in high-grade serous ovarian cancerNPJ genomic medicine · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a highly lethal gynecological malignancy, with the high-grade serous ovarian cancer subtype (HGSOC) accounting for a significant proportion of cases. Despite platinum-based chemotherapies being the primary treatment for EOC, HGSOC displays high resistance to these therapies. Black women have the highest mortality/incidence ratio of all ethnic groups, and recent studies suggest significant genetic and epigenetic differences between black and non-Hispanic white women who are treatment naïve.
Read the full summary ↓
This study aims to explore immunogenic differences and hypermethylation phenotype in black women that may contribute to poorer outcomes within this patient group. We collected primary tumor samples from 36 black and 31 non-Hispanic white (NHW) treatment-naïve patients via biopsy and performed methylomic and transcriptomic analyses. Our analysis revealed significant differences in gene expression and methylation between black and NHW patients. Among the differentially expressed genes, we found significant pathway enrichment within p53/apoptosis signaling pathway and cholesterol/lipid modulation. Additionally, we observed mild hypermethylation in black patients vs. the NHW cohort. Furthermore, we discovered differences in the proportion of important immune cell types between the two groups, with CD8+ T-cells and CD4+ memory-resting T-cells being significantly higher proportionally in black patients. In conclusion, our study identified significant differential expression between black and NHW patient groups, as well as mild hypermethylation and differences in the proportion of important immune cell types. These findings provide further insights into the biological mechanisms underlying the disparities in outcomes between black and NHW patients with EOC. Further exploration of the contribution of these differences to clinical outcomes and treatment response in black women is warranted.
Published in
Comparative transcriptomic, epigenomic and immunological analyses identify drivers of disparity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Huang H, Keathley R, Kim U et al. · NPJ genomic medicine 2024 · PMID 39622796 · doi:10.1038/s41525-024-00448-2
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE240929_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1005901 and SRA study SRP455324. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
36 × B vs 30 × W

Supports a between-group comparison across 66 samples.

How we read this: 2 replicated groups read from 66 sample titles; they account for 66 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 26 more — browse all 66 samples with per-sample file links →

More Ovarian cancer datasets

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.