← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Calcitonin gene-related peptide promotes reparative function of interleukin-4 educated human macrophages via COX1/PGD2 signalling

GSE242543 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 12 samples Submitted 2024/09/30 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 12 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
12 samples: 12 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Interleukin-4 activated human macrophages (M(IL4) promote epithelial wound healing and exert an anti-colitic effect. Blood monocyte-derived M(IL4)s from healthy donors and individuals with Crohn’s disease had increased mRNA expression of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor chain, RAMP1, suggesting neural modulation of the M(IL4)s function.
Read the full summary ↓
Thus, human (MIL4)s were treated with CGRP and the cells' phagocytic, epithelial wound repair and anti-colitic functions were assessed. M(IL4,CGRP)s had increased mannose receptor (CD206) and FcgRIIa (CD32a) mRNA expression, a subtle, but significant increase in phagocytosis, and decreased production of CXCL1, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5 and CXCL9 following exposure to E. coli. When delivered systemically (106 cells, ip.) to oxazolone-treated rag1-/- mice, M(IL4,CGRP) had an anti-colitic effect superior to M(IL4)s from the same healthy blood donor. The human colon CaCo2 epithelial cell line in an in vitro wounding model revealed that conditioned medium (CM) from M(IL4,CGRP) had increased amounts of TGFb and increased wound-healing capacity compared to matched M(IL4)-CM. Moreover, M(IL4,CGRP)s displayed increased cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and prostaglandin D2, and CM from M(IL4,CGRP)s treated with indomethacin or SC-560 to inhibit COX1 activity failed to promote repair of wounded CaCo2 cell monolayers. These data confirm the human M(IL4)s’ anti-colitic effect that could be enhanced by the local availability of CGRP, which may be dependent, at least in part via macrophage COX1/PDG2 activity. Thus, neuronal input is revealed as an important local modifier capable of boosting the anti-colitic effect of autologous M(IL4) transfer to treat enteric inflammation
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE242543_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1013899 and SRA study SRP459442. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
12 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 12 sample titles: 12 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.