← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Comparative Analysis of the Physiological and Transport Functions of Various Sources of Renal Proximal Tubule Cells Under Static and Fluidic Conditions in PhysioMimix TC12 Platform

GSE246180 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 69 samples Submitted 2024/10/23 Platform GPL16791
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 69 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
69 samples: 24 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Comparative analysis of the physiological and transport functions of various sources of renal proximal tubule cells under static and fluidic conditions in PhysioMimix T12 platformDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Drugs and other xenobiotics are not only secreted/reabsorbed by the renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTEC) but may also adversely impact kidney function. In vitro models that can afford prediction of toxic effects and model directional transport are in high demand in both drug and chemical safety; accordingly, active development of new models is underway.
Read the full summary ↓
The objective of this study was to investigate physiological and transport function of various sources of human RPTECs under static and fluidic conditions. We tested TERT1-immortalized RPTECs, including OAT1-, OCT2- and OAT3-overexpressing variants) and two primary RPETC sources. Cells were cultured on transwell membranes in two conditions – static (24-well transwells) and fluidic (transwells placed into PhysioMimix TC12 organ-on-chip platform with 2 L/s flow). We evaluated barrier formation, transport, and gene expression. We show that primary RPTECs may not be suitable for studies of directional transport on transwell membranes because they form an inferior barrier even though they show generally more relevant expression of key transporters, especially when shear stress is present. Both TERT1 and -OAT1 and -OAT3 overexpressing cells formed robust barrier, but it was unaffected by shear stress. TERT1-OAT1 cells exhibited inhibitable pAH transport; shear stress increased pAH transport function of these cells. However, efficient tenofovir secretion and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) reabsorption by TERT1-OAT1 cells were not modulated by shear stress. With respect to gene expression profiles, we found that both TERT1 and TERT1-OAT1 cells exhibited human kidney-like transcriptomes, but that shear stress did not result in an apparent enhancement of the kidney phenotype. Overall, our data show that addition of flow to in vitro studies of the renal proximal tubule may afford benefits in some aspects of kidney function, but that careful consideration of the impact such studies would have on the cost and throughput of the experiments is needed.
Published in
Comparative analysis of the physiological and transport functions of various sources of renal proximal tubule cells under static and fluidic conditions in PhysioMimix T12 platform
Sakolish C, Moyer HL, Tsai HD et al. · Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals 2025 · PMID 39884810 · doi:10.1124/dmd.124.001488
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE246180_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1032034 and SRA study SRP468310. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
24 conditions, mostly in triplicate
CN_Cisplatin_TERT_Parent_Apical ×3 CN_Cisplatin_TERT_Parent_Basolateral ×3 CN_Tenofovir_TERT_Parent_Apical ×3 CN_Tenofovir_TERT_Parent_Basolateral ×3 CN_PFOA_TERT_Parent_Apical ×3 CN_PFOA_TERT_Parent_Basolateral ×3 CN_Tenofovir_TERT_OAT1_Basolateral ×3 CN_PFOA_TERT_OAT1_Apical ×3 +17 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 68 samples.

How we read this: 24 replicated groups read from 69 sample titles; they account for 68 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 29 more — browse all 69 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.