← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Transcriptomic Profiling of Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Enables Reliable Annotation of the Cancer-specific Transcriptome and Molecular Subtype (plasma_cancer)

GSE259422 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 156 samples Submitted 2024/02/29 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 156 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Topic
Colorectal cancerThis series is part of our curated briefing on it.
Samples
156 samples: 34 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Transcriptomic Profiling of Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Enables Reliable Annotation of the Cancer-Specific Transcriptome and Molecular SubtypeCancer research · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Longitudinal monitoring of patients with advanced cancers is crucial to evaluate both disease burden and treatment response. Current liquid biopsy approaches mostly rely on the detection of DNA-based biomarkers. However, plasma RNA analysis can unleash tremendous opportunities for tumor state interrogation and molecular subtyping. Through the application of deep learning algorithms to the deconvolved transcriptomes of RNA within plasma extracellular vesicles (evRNA), we successfully predict consensus molecular subtypes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Read the full summary ↓
We further demonstrate the ability to monitor changes in transcriptomic subtype under treatment selection pressure and identify molecular pathways in evRNA associated with recurrence. Our approach also identified expressed gene fusions and neoepitopes from evRNA. These results demonstrate the feasibility of transcriptomic-based liquid biopsy platforms for precision oncology approaches, spanning from the longitudinal monitoring of tumor subtype changes to identification of expressed fusions and neoantigens as cancer-specific therapeutic targets, sans the need for tissue-based sampling.
Published in
Transcriptomic Profiling of Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Enables Reliable Annotation of the Cancer-Specific Transcriptome and Molecular Subtype
Bahrambeigi V, Lee JJ, Branchi V et al. · Cancer research 2024 · PMID 38451249 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-4070
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE259422_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1081457 and SRA study SRP492161. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
34 conditions, mostly in triplicate
P46 ×7 P45 ×5 P43 ×4 P59 ×4 P60 ×4 P62 ×4 P63 ×4 P64 ×4 +68 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 114 samples.

How we read this: 34 replicated groups read from 156 sample titles; they account for 114 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 116 more — browse all 156 samples with per-sample file links →

More Colorectal cancer datasets

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.