← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Three-dimensional regulatory hubs support oncogenic programs in glioblastoma [ChIP-seq]

GSE260528 Homo sapiens (human) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 20 samples Submitted 2025/03/06 Platform GPL30173
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · human · 20 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
20 samples: 20 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Three-dimensional regulatory hubs support oncogenic programs in glioblastomaMolecular cell · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Enhancer-promoter communication in the context of the three-dimensional (3D) nucleus is critical for the regulation of transcriptional programs specific for cell identity. Here, we profile the 3D enhancer-promoter networks of primary patient-derived human glioma spheres (GSCs) in comparison with neuronal stem cells to identify candidate central nodes of GSC tumorigenic programs.
Read the full summary ↓
We have identified highly interacting 3D enhancer-promoter “hubs” which strongly associate with robust and coordinated expression of tumor-associated genes, suggesting potentially central roles in the regulation of oncogenic programs. Integration of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data from The Cancer Genome Atlas showed that 3D regulatory hubs are strongly enriched for recurrent point mutations in the larger cohort of glioblastoma patients. In a proof-of-concept experiment, epigenetic perturbation of a highly interacting and recurrent 3D enhancer hub in the GOLIM4 locus led to significant downregulation of multiple hub-connected genes and reduced clonogenicity along with a global shift in the transcriptional states. Finally, integration of published H3K27ac HiChIP from other cancer types enabled the identification of both “universal” and cancer type-specific 3D regulatory hubs which enrich for different oncogenic programs and potential regulators, and often associate with a worse prognosis. Overall, our study identifies complex 3D regulatory hubs in glioblastoma and provides computational and experimental support for their potential role in driving oncogenic programs and promoting tumorigenic properties.
Published in
Three-dimensional regulatory hubs support oncogenic programs in glioblastoma
Breves SL, Di Giammartino DC, Nicholson J et al. · Molecular cell 2025 · PMID 40147440 · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2025.03.007
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE260528_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1081942 and SRA study SRP492439. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
20 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 20 sample titles: 20 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.