Establishment and characterization of persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in air-liquid interface cultures of human airway epithelial cells
RNA-seq (gene expression) · Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Homo sapiens · 14 samples
- What it is
- RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
- Organism
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Homo sapiens
- Samples
- 14 samples: 5 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
- Data you can get
- A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
- Paper
- Establishment and characterization of persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in air-liquid interface cultures of human airway epithelial cellsInfection and immunity · 2025
Read the full summary ↓
Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.
Processed table
The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.
Supplementary files
The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE262433_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).
Raw sequencing reads
The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.
What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.
Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1091709 and SRA study SRP497755. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.
Supports a between-group comparison across 14 samples.
How we read this: 5 replicated groups read from 14 sample titles; they account for 14 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.
- GSM8169619 calu3-5d_1 calu3-5d
- GSM8169620 calu3-5d_2 calu3-5d
- GSM8169621 calu3-5d_3 calu3-5d
- GSM8169622 calu3-1d_1 calu3-1d
- GSM8169623 calu3-1d_2 calu3-1d
- GSM8169624 PAO1_calu3-5d_1 PAO1_calu3-5d
- GSM8169625 PAO1_calu3-5d_2 PAO1_calu3-5d
- GSM8169626 PAO1_calu3-5d_3 PAO1_calu3-5d
- GSM8169627 PAO1_calu3-1d_1 PAO1_calu3-1d
- GSM8169628 PAO1_calu3-1d_2 PAO1_calu3-1d
- GSM8169629 PAO1_calu3-1d_3 PAO1_calu3-1d
- GSM8169630 PAO1_PL-DMEM_1 PAO1_PL-DMEM
- GSM8169631 PAO1_PL-DMEM_2 PAO1_PL-DMEM
- GSM8169632 PAO1_PL-DMEM_3 PAO1_PL-DMEM
No close match found for this topic, so these are simply the most-viewed datasets of the same kind.
Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.