← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

yHSC and oHSC scRNAseq with oHSC AThi ATlo Index Sorting. Assessing the transcriptional changes associated with autophagy engagement in old hematopoietic stem cells at single cell resolution. [scRNA-Seq]

GSE265909 Mus musculus (mouse) Single-cell RNA-seq 563 samples Submitted 2024/05/15 Platform GPL21103
At a glance

Single-cell RNA-seq · mouse · 563 samples

What it is
Single-cell RNA-seqGene activity measured in thousands of individual cells, so cell types can be told apart.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
563 samples: 101 × GFP-LC3 oHSC_LO vs 101 × GFP-LC3 oHSC_MID vs 100 × GFP-LC3 oHSC_HI vs 98 × GFP-LC3 yHSCGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Autophagy counters inflammation-driven glycolytic impairment in aging hematopoietic stem cellsCell stem cell · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Index sorted SMART-Seq2 sequencing to map AThi oHSC vs ATlo oHSC based on GFP-LC3 marker levels. Between yHSC and oHSC the largest transcriptional differences observed in the G0/G1 cell cycle phase cluster. Within oHSCs, AThi oHSCs were almost exclusively observed in the G0/G1 cluster, whereas ATlo oHSCs were spread across the activation continuum, with cells still in the G0/G1 cluster found more proximal to S cluster cells.
Published in
Autophagy counters inflammation-driven glycolytic impairment in aging hematopoietic stem cells
Dellorusso PV, Proven MA, Calero-Nieto FJ et al. · Cell stem cell 2024 · PMID 38754428 · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2024.04.020
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE265909_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Single-cell studies usually ship their counts as 10x files (matrix.mtx, barcodes.tsv, features.tsv), an .h5 file, or an .rds / .h5ad object that Seurat or Scanpy can open. Look for those among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1104666 and SRA study SRP504083. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
101 × GFP-LC3 oHSC_LO vs 101 × GFP-LC3 oHSC_MID vs 100 × GFP-LC3 oHSC_HI vs 98 × GFP-LC3 yHSC

Supports a between-group comparison across 400 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from the first 400 of 563 sample titles; they account for 400 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 523 more — browse all 563 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.