← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

3D genome of CD8+ T cells reveals IRF8-mediated exhaustion in cancer

GSE269676 Mus musculus (mouse) Other 18 samples Submitted 2025/10/01 Platform GPL21273
At a glance

mouse · 18 samples

Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
18 samples: 9 conditions, mostly in duplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI.
Summary (written by the submitters)
CD8+ T cell responses are essential for anti-tumor immunity, but chronic antigen exposure in cancer can lead to T cell exhaustion, marked by high PD-1 expression. Recent studies have identified progenitor-like CD8+ T cells (Tprog cells) within tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) that sustain antitumor responses. These cells can differentiate into terminally exhausted cells (Tterm cells), losing their proliferative and effector functions.
Read the full summary ↓
Immunotherapy aims to enhance CD8+ TILs functionality, promoting their transition from Tprog to Tterm cells. However, the mechanisms behind this exhaustion remain unclear. Single-cell RNA sequencing and ATAC-seq have revealed distinct profiles and chromatin accessibility between progenitor and terminally exhausted states. Histone modifications predict a loss of enhancer-promoter contacts during this transition. Chromatin structure plays a crucial role in T cell differentiation. We constructed a high-resolution 3D genome map of CD8+ T cell subsets and, through multi-omics integration, identified chromatin structure changes linked to T cell exhaustion, including alterations in topologically associating domains (TADs) and chromatin loops, providing new insights into the genetic basis of CD8+ T cell exhaustion in cancer.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need.

All supplementary files ↗
3 · The original raw files

Whole study · RAW.tar

Everything the authors deposited as one archive (GSE269676_RAW.tar), including the raw array or instrument files. Can be large; the picker in step 2 takes just the samples you need.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1123215. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
9 conditions, mostly in duplicate
naive ×2 effector ×2 memory ×2 pro_tumor ×2 ter_tumor ×2 pro_cl13 ×2 ter_cl13 ×2 WT ×2 +1 more

Supports a case/control comparison: 4 samples read as cases, 4 as controls.

How we read this: 9 replicated groups read from 18 sample titles; they account for 18 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.