← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

In vivo CRISPR screen reveals interplay of epigenetic regulators underlies kinetics of hepatobiliary reprogramming [CUT&Tag]

GSE270508 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 183 samples Submitted 2025/01/01 Platform GPL30172
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 183 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
183 samples: 59 conditions, mostly in duplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
In vivo CRISPR screening reveals epigenetic regulators of hepatobiliary plasticityGenes & development · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Under chronic liver injury, a small fraction of hepatocytes undergoes reprogramming to biliary epithelial cells (BECs) through a multistep process of chromatin and transcriptional remodeling in which the hepatocyte phenotype is repressed and the biliary phenotype is activated. However, the epigenetic basis underlying this phenomenon is largely unknown.
Read the full summary ↓
Here, using a lineage-traced model of cholestatic liver injury, we investigated the role of histone posttranslational modification in the kinetics of biliary reprogramming. In this study, we performed CUT&Tag to profile the changes in histone landscape throughout reprogramming and explored the impact of Nsd1 and Kdm2a knockout.
Published in
In vivo CRISPR screening reveals epigenetic regulators of hepatobiliary plasticity
Sussman JH, Cure HW, Yuan S et al. · Genes & development 2025 · PMID 40169232 · doi:10.1101/gad.352420.124
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE270508_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1127021 and SRA study SRP515409. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
59 conditions, mostly in duplicate
BEC_rep1_H4K20me ×3 BEC_rep2_H4K20me ×3 Hep_rep1_H4K20me ×3 Hep_rep2_H4K20me ×3 Rep_early_rep1_H4K20me ×3 Rep_early_rep2_H4K20me ×3 Rep_interm_rep1_H4K20me ×3 Rep_interm_rep2_H4K20me ×3 +105 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 129 samples.

How we read this: 59 replicated groups read from 183 sample titles; they account for 129 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 143 more — browse all 183 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.