← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Tumor-Suppressing Multi-Enterobacteria enhance the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer

GSE271663 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 36 samples Submitted 2026/04/26 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 36 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
36 samples: 8 conditions, mostly with about 6 replicates eachGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Tumor-suppressing multi-enterobacteria enhance the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy in microsatellite stable colorectal cancerScientific reports · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
Gut microbiome significantly influences immunotherapy responses in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. While individual enterobacteria have been identified as enhancers of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy, the synergistic effects of multiple enterobacteria remain underexplored. To fill the gap, we introduced Tumor-Suppressing Multi-Enterobacteria (TSME), a consortium of nine beneficial intestinal probiotic strains, and investigated its impact on the anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy for microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC.
Read the full summary ↓
Using a tumor-bearing mouse model and genomic sequencing techniques, our research demonstrated that TSME significantly improved therapy efficacy by optimizing tumor immune microenvironment. Specifically, the addition of TSME notably increased CD8+ T infiltration, modulated cytokine profiles, and up-regulated crucial immune-related pathways, including TNF and JAK-STAT. Additionally, TSME altered intestinal microbial composition, enriching beneficial bacteria such as Akkermansia and Alistipes. These findings suggest that the well-engineered multi-enterobacteria could significantly enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy for MSS CRC by synergistically modulating the immune and microbial landscapes.
Published in
Tumor-suppressing multi-enterobacteria enhance the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer
Su X, Jin J, Huang Y et al. · Scientific reports 2026 · PMID 41851187 · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-44494-5
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE271663_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1132721 and SRA study SRP518383. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
8 conditions, mostly with about 6 replicates each
feces, control group, mouse ×6 feces, TSME group, mouse ×6 feces, αPD-L1 group, mouse ×6 feces, αPD-L1 + TSME group, mouse ×6 subcutaneous tumor, control group, mouse ×3 subcutaneous tumor, TSME group, mouse ×3 subcutaneous tumor, αPD-L1 group, mouse ×3 subcutaneous tumor, αPD-L1 + TSME group, mouse ×3

Supports a case/control comparison: 9 samples read as cases, 6 as controls.

How we read this: 8 replicated groups read from 36 sample titles; they account for 36 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.