← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Comprehensive Molecular and Functional Analysis of NUTM1-Rearranged Leukemia [ATAC-Seq]

GSE276675 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 12 samples Submitted 2026/04/22 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 12 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
12 samples: 3 × Control vs 3 × BN1 vs 3 × MA9 vs 3 × MEGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Comprehensive molecular and functional analysis of NUTM1-rearranged leukemiaBlood · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
NUTM1-rearrangement (NUTM1-r) represents a significant subset of infant B-ALL, particularly prevalent in cases lacking KMT2A-rearrangements (KMT2A-r). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms for the characteristic leukemia have not been fully elucidated. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that NUTM1-r infant leukemia is characterized by a unique transcriptomic and epigenetic landscape with global hypomethylation, delineating a discrete leukemia entity.
Read the full summary ↓
Functional interrogation of the BRD9-NUTM1 fusion demonstrates its dual role in promoting B-lineage commitment while conferring leukemic stem cell properties. Strikingly, single transduction of BRD9-NUTM1 is sufficient to induce serially-transplantable pro-B-like leukemia in vivo, recapitulating key features of human NUTM1-r B-ALL, including NUTM1 overexpression, skewed B cell transcriptional programs, and low CD34 expression. Mechanistically, BRD9-NUTM1 expression gives rise to distinctive open chromatin regions with global enhancement of H3K27Ac, particularly at loci associated with Myc, NF-κB, and posterior Hoxa genes. Notably, BRD9-NUTM1 leukemic cells responded robustly to cytarabine, in contrast to the relative resistance observed in KMT2A-r leukemias. Interestingly, our findings highlight a discrepancy observed in the clinical behavior of NUTM1-r leukemias, where the transformed cells display characteristics of stemness, yet tend to lose these properties under chemotherapy due to the dependence on active transcription. Our findings delineate the unique molecular profile of NUTM1-r leukemias, suggesting opportunities for targeted therapies that exploit these specific vulnerabilities.
Published in
Comprehensive molecular and functional analysis of NUTM1-rearranged leukemia
Nishimura K, Isobe T, Shigehiro T et al. · Blood 2026 · PMID 41460961 · doi:10.1182/blood.2024026928
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE276675_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1158684 and SRA study SRP531688. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
3 × Control vs 3 × BN1 vs 3 × MA9 vs 3 × ME

Supports a between-group comparison across 12 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 12 sample titles; they account for 12 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.