← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Dissecting RNA Selectivity Mediated by Tandem RNA-Binding Domains

GSE280076 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 66 samples Submitted 2025/01/31 Platform GPL18573Platform GPL35012Platform GPL19424
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 66 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
66 samples: 28 conditions, mostly in duplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Dissecting RNA selectivity mediated by tandem RNA-binding domainsThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
RNA-protein interactions are pivotal to proper gene regulation. Many RNA-binding proteins possess multiple RNA-binding domains; however, how these domains interplay to specify and regulate RNA targets remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate three multi-domain proteins, Musashi-1, Musashi-2, and Unkempt, three factors which share a high degree of RNA specificity.
Read the full summary ↓
We use a combination of massively parallel in vitro assays with random or naturally derived RNA sequences and find that individual domains within a protein can have differing affinities, specificities, and spacing preferences. Further, we emphasize that while all three proteins have overlapping motif specificities, non-overlapping sequences may allow for target discrimination. We carry out large scale competition assays between these proteins and determine how individual protein specificities and affinities influence competitive binding. Integration of in vivo binding and regulation with in vitro specificities shows that target selection involves a combination of the protein intrinsic specificities described here, but cellular context is critical to drive these proteins to motifs in specific transcript regions. Finally, evolutionarily conserved RNA regions display evidence of binding multiple RBPs in vivo, and these RNA regions recapitulate this trend with the highest affinity in vitro. We highlight the importance of understanding features of complex RNA-protein interactions and how protein-target discrimination can be established.
Published in
Dissecting RNA selectivity mediated by tandem RNA-binding domains
Harris SE, Hu Y, Bridges K et al. · The Journal of biological chemistry 2025 · PMID 40120682 · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108435
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE280076_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1176144 and SRA study SRP540215. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
28 conditions, mostly in duplicate
20mer_RNA_input ×4 pos_RNA_input ×4 MSI1 RRM1 RBNS, 1000, ×2 MSI1 RRM1 RBNS, 250, ×2 MSI1 RRM1 RBNS, 500, ×2 MSI1 RRM2 RBNS, 1000, ×2 MSI1 RRM2 RBNS, 250, ×2 MSI1 RRM2 RBNS, 500, ×2 +26 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 60 samples.

How we read this: 28 replicated groups read from 66 sample titles; they account for 60 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 26 more — browse all 66 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.