← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Disruption of PRC1 Components RING1A and RING1B Promotes Angiogenesis via Relieving BMP4 Repression [CUT&Tag]

GSE281870 Homo sapiens (human) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 12 samples Submitted 2025/07/24 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · human · 12 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
12 samples: 3 × HUVECs, H2AK119ub, CUT&Tag, biol vs 3 × HUVECs, RING1A, CUT&Tag, biol vs 3 × HUVECs, RING1B, CUT&Tag, biol vs 3 × HUVECs, Control, CUT&Tag, biolGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Disruption of PRC1 components RING1A and RING1B promotes angiogenesis via relieving BMP4 repressionJournal of advanced research · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
Angiogenesis is crucial for maintaining tissue homeostasis and responding to injury and disease. Epigenetic mechanisms have been elucidated to regulate the expression of pro-angiogenic factors and modulate angiogenesis. The Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) is a key epigenetic repressive complex that regulates multiple biological functions.
Read the full summary ↓
Within this complex, RING1A and RING1B, which serve as the E3 ubiquitin ligases for PRC1, contribute to the monoubiquitylation of histone H2A on Lysine 119 (H2AK119ub), thereby repressing gene transcription. However, the role of RING1A and RING1B in regulating angiogenesis has remained elusive. In this study, we demonstrate that RING1A and RING1B suppress angiogenic capacity in vitro, although they do not inhibit migration and proliferation in endothelial cells (ECs). Furthermore, by integrating RNA sequencing data from RING1A knockdown or RING1B knockdown ECs with CUT&Tag assay results for RING1A, RING1B, and H2AK119ub in ECs, we have identified that PRC1 inhibits angiogenesis by repressing BMP4 expression, a pro-angiogenic factor known to regulate angiogenesis. Additionally, we verify that the knockdown of RING1A and RING1B enhances angiogenesis in vivo, which may provide a new therapeutic target for angiogenesis-related diseases.
Published in
Disruption of PRC1 components RING1A and RING1B promotes angiogenesis via relieving BMP4 repression
Zhang J, Peng X, Qin J et al. · Journal of advanced research 2026 · PMID 40684938 · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2025.07.025
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE281870_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1186087 and SRA study SRP545213. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
3 × HUVECs, H2AK119ub, CUT&Tag, biol vs 3 × HUVECs, RING1A, CUT&Tag, biol vs 3 × HUVECs, RING1B, CUT&Tag, biol vs 3 × HUVECs, Control, CUT&Tag, biol

Supports a between-group comparison across 12 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 12 sample titles; they account for 12 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.