← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Development and comprehensive evaluation of synthetic scarless circular RNAs

GSE284757 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 12 samples Submitted 2025/03/01 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 12 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
12 samples: 3 × HEK293T cells, RNA produced by AnaPIE transfection, vs 3 × HEK293T cells, RNA produced by SCAP transfection, vs 3 × HEK293T cells, RNA produced by Linear transfection, vs 3 × HEK293T cells, Control,Groups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Development and comprehensive evaluation of scarless circularization systems for circular RNA therapeuticsMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a unique class of single-stranded RNA molecules with a closed-loop structure that confer enhanced stability, extended protein expression, and resistance to exonucleases, making them promising candidates for RNA therapeutics. In recent years, several methods have been developed to generate circRNAs, including the traditional, scar-containing Anabaena Permuted Intron-Exon (Ana-PIE) method and newer “scarless” circularization approaches.
Read the full summary ↓
This study introduces a novel scarless circularization method, Split-Coxsackievirus B3-Anabaena Permuted Intron-Exon (Split-CVB3 Ana-PIE, SCAP). Scarless circular RNAs generated using the SCAP system were systematically compared to their scarred counterparts produced by the Ana-PIE system in terms of circularization efficiency, protein expression, stability, and immune response. The SCAP system achieved circularization efficiencies comparable to those of the Ana-PIE system while significantly enhancing protein expression. Scarless circular RNAs exhibited similar stability to scarred circular RNAs and did not trigger significant immune responses. These findings highlight the potential of scarless circular RNAs in gene therapy and vaccine development, demonstrating that removing extraneous sequences improves translation efficiency without compromising stability or immunogenicity. This study provides a foundation for the rational design of circular RNAs, with future efforts focusing on diverse target genes, optimized delivery platforms, and in vivo validation.
Published in
Development and comprehensive evaluation of scarless circularization systems for circular RNA therapeutics
Chen L, Song L, Yang J et al. · Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids 2025 · PMID 40606646 · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102587
This dataset
Open GSE284757 in finder → Find more human RNA-seq datasets →
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

Series matrix ↓
2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE284757_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

All supplementary files ↗ Whole study · RAW.tar ↓
3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

Raw reads on ENA ↗

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1200618 and SRA study SRP552658. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

NCBI GEO page ↗ Paper (PMID 40606646) ↗
Study design
3 × HEK293T cells, RNA produced by AnaPIE transfection, vs 3 × HEK293T cells, RNA produced by SCAP transfection, vs 3 × HEK293T cells, RNA produced by Linear transfection, vs 3 × HEK293T cells, Control,

Supports a between-group comparison across 12 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 12 sample titles; they account for 12 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.