A hexamer tandem repeat RNA embedded within an SVA retrotransposon drives R-loop formation and neurodegeneration
RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 41 samples
- What it is
- RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
- Organism
- Homo sapiens (human)
- Samples
- 41 samples: 41 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
- Data you can get
- A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
- Paper
- A hexamer tandem repeat RNA embedded within an SVA retrotransposon drives R-loop formation and neurodegenerationCell reports · 2025
Read the full summary ↓
Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.
Processed table
The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.
Supplementary files
The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE289534_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).
Raw sequencing reads
The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.
What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.
Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1223395. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.
Supports a case/control comparison: 3 samples read as cases, 12 as controls.
How we read this: Read from 41 sample titles: 41 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.
- GSM8793743 VFO__1N__Cohort_A__33113.2I__Control__d30
- GSM8793744 VFO__2N__Cohort_A__33109.2G__XDP__d30
- GSM8793745 VFO__3N__Cohort_A__33109.2G-1A4__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d30
- GSM8793746 VFO__4N__Cohort_A__33109.2G-2F2__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d30
- GSM8793747 VFO__5N__Cohort_A__33113.2I__Control__d60
- GSM8793748 VFO__6N__Cohort_A__33109.2G__XDP__d60
- GSM8793749 VFO__7N__Cohort_A__33109.2G-1A4__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d60
- GSM8793750 VFO__8N__Cohort_A__33109.2G-2F2__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d60
- GSM8793751 VFO__9__Cohort_A__33113.2I__Control__d90
- GSM8793752 VFO__53R__Cohort_A__33109.2G__XDP__d90
- GSM8793753 VFO__12N__Cohort_A__33109.2G-2F2__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d90
- GSM8793754 VFO__13N__Cohort_A__33113.2I__Control__d120
- GSM8793755 VFO__14N__Cohort_A__33109.2G__XDP__d120
- GSM8793756 VFO__15N__Cohort_A__33109.2G-1A4__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d120
- GSM8793757 VFO__16N__Cohort_A__33109.2G-2F2__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d120
- GSM8793758 VFO__17N__Cohort_B__33114.C__Control__d30
- GSM8793759 VFO__18N__Cohort_B__33109.2B__XDP__d30
- GSM8793760 VFO__19N__Cohort_B__33109.2B-3A12__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d30
- GSM8793761 VFO__20__Cohort_B__33114.C__Control__d60
- GSM8793762 VFO__21N__Cohort_B__33109.2B__XDP__d60
- GSM8793763 VFO__22N__Cohort_B__33109.2B-3A12__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d60
- GSM8793764 VFO__23N__Cohort_B__33114.C__Control__d90
- GSM8793765 VFO__24N__Cohort_B__33109.2B__XDP__d90
- GSM8793766 VFO__25N__Cohort_B__33109.2B-3A12__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d90
- GSM8793767 VFO__26__Cohort_B__33114.C__Control__d120
- GSM8793768 VFO__27N__Cohort_B__33109.2B__XDP__d120
- GSM8793769 VFO__28N__Cohort_B__33109.2B-3A12__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d120
- GSM8793770 VFO__29N__Cohort_C__33362.C__Control__d30
- GSM8793771 VFO__31N__Cohort_C__33363.D-3C2__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d30
- GSM8793772 VFO__32N__Cohort_C__33362.C__Control__d60
- GSM8793773 VFO__33N__Cohort_C__33363.D__XDP__d60
- GSM8793774 VFO__34N__Cohort_C__33363.D-3C2__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d60
- GSM8793775 VFO__35N__Cohort_C__33362.C__Control__d90
- GSM8793776 VFO__36N__Cohort_C__33363.D__XDP__d90
- GSM8793777 VFO__37N__Cohort_C__33363.D-3C2__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d90
- GSM8793778 VFO__38N__Cohort_C__33362.C__Control__d120
- GSM8793779 VFO__39N__Cohort_C__33363.D__XDP__d120
- GSM8793780 VFO__40N__Cohort_C__33363.D-3C2__DELTA-SVA-XDP__d120
- GSM8793781 VFO__47N__Cohort_Female_organoids__33360.A__Carrier-Mutant__d90
- GSM8793782 VFO__50N__Cohort_Female_organoids__33360.A__Carrier-Mutant__d120
+ 1 more — browse all 41 samples with per-sample file links →
- GSE276544 MVA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates encoding different spike protein conformations induce distinct early transcriptional responses which may impact subsequent adaptive immunity 305 samples shares formation
- GSE285217 Digital transformation of herbal medicine: Conversion to biological entity data using Qi related decoction and constituent herbal medicine-induced transcriptome sequencing_third_A549 270 samples shares formation
- GSE283054 Digital transformation of herbal medicine: Conversion to biological entity data using Qi related decoction and constituent herbal medicine-induced transcriptome sequencing_third_HepG2 270 samples shares formation
- GSE285424 Digital transformation of herbal medicine: Conversion to biological entity data using Qi related decoction and constituent herbal medicine-induced transcriptome sequencing [HT29] 270 samples shares formation
- GSE285554 Digital transformation of herbal medicine: Conversion to biological entity data using Qi related decoction and constituent herbal medicine-induced transcriptome sequencing_third_SW1783 270 samples shares formation
- GSE311827 AP-1 Mediates Cellular Adaptation and Memory Formation [Bulk RNA-seq] 192 samples shares formation
- GSE180791 Proteogenomic characterization reveals that lipid droplet formation promotes esophageal squamous cell cancer progression 102 samples shares formation
- GSE285008 Transcriptome Response and Protein Abundance are Correlated with Split Formation and Cell Detachment as Secondary Effects to Autoantibodies in Human Skin Organ Culture Models for Pemphgus Vulgaris 78 samples shares formation
Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.