← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

The Polycomb Protein EED Constrains the SCLC Neuroendocrine Phenotype and Drives Lung Cancer Histological Transformation [ATAC-seq]

GSE293600 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 9 samples Submitted 2026/08/05 Platform GPL19057
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 9 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
9 samples: 4 × EED-Mutant RPR2 tumo vs 2 × WT EED RPR2 tumor 1267 vs 2 × EED-Mutant RPR2 tumor 1260Groups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Lung cancer is comprised of distinct histological subtypes including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although histological subtypes of lung cancer are often mutually exclusive, patients can present with combined LUAD and SCLC histology tumors. Moreover, LUADs can histologically transform to SCLC through lineage plasticity as a mechanism of resistance to targeted therapies, which most often occurs in EGFR-Mutant LUAD with concurrent RB1 and TP53 inactivation after treatment with EGFR inhibitors.
Read the full summary ↓
The mechanisms that promote LUAD to SCLC histological transformation are poorly understood. Expression of genes associated with PRC2 activity increase during LUAD to SCLC histological transformation, but it is unknown whether PRC2 is a causative driver of histological transformation in lung cancer. To study the role of the PRC2 complex in SCLC tumorigenesis, we used CRISPR-based somatic gene editing to make SCLC genetically-engineered mouse models (GEMMs) deficient for PRC2 through inactivation of EED; PRC2’s core scaffolding subunit. Strikingly, EED inactivation caused complete histological transformation from ASCL1-positive SCLC to LUAD through an intermediate NEUROD1-positive/NCAM-positive cell state. Mechanistically, SCLC to LUAD histological transformation is initiated when PRC2 inactivation de-represses bivalent genes marked by both H3K27me3 and K3K4me3 including RAS, PI3K, and MAPK pathway genes as well as NEUROD1. Lastly, we developed an EGFR-Mutant LUAD GEMM with concurrent RB1 and TP53 inactivation where EGFR inhibition can promote SCLC transformation and a metastatic phenotype; both of which are completely abrogated by EED inactivation. Together, these findings show that the PRC2 complex is required to drive ASCL1-positive neuroendocrine SCLC with its loss promoting the LUAD phenotype nominating PRC2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to block SCLC transformation.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE293600_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1245344 and SRA study SRP576018. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
4 × EED-Mutant RPR2 tumo vs 2 × WT EED RPR2 tumor 1267 vs 2 × EED-Mutant RPR2 tumor 1260

Supports a case/control comparison: 6 samples read as cases, 1 as controls.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 9 sample titles; they account for 8 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.