← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Canonical Hedgehog Signaling Controls Astral Microtubules and Mitotic Spindle Orientation in Neural Progenitors and iPSCs

GSE296672 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 12 samples Submitted 2025/06/25 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 12 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
12 samples: 4 × DMSO vs 4 × SAG vs 4 × SAG + ForskolinGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Hedgehog signaling controls astral microtubules and mitotic spindle orientation in neural progenitors and iPSCsFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Mitotic spindle orientation is crucial for cell fate determination and tissue organization. Although the intracellular machinery governing spindle orientation is well characterized, whether and how secreted factors, such as morphogens, regulate this process remains poorly understood. This study investigated the role of Hedgehog (HH) signaling in modulating mitotic spindle orientation in neural progenitor cells and in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
Read the full summary ↓
Time-lapse microscopy of cerebral organoids and iPSCs revealed that HH signaling increases the angle of the mitotic spindle relative to the apical surface, prolongs mitosis, and enhances spindle rotation. Mechanistically, HH signaling reduces both the number and the length of astral microtubules, key regulators of spindle orientation. This reduction correlates with increased spindle angle in iPSCs. Furthermore, we show that canonical HH signaling, involving GLI-dependent transcriptional regulation, contributes to these effects. RNA sequencing and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that HH signaling upregulates genes associated with microtubule depolymerization, suggesting a transcriptional mechanism by which HH signaling influences astral microtubule dynamics and, consequently, mitotic spindle orientation. These findings highlight a novel link between a morphogen, transcriptional regulation, and the control of mitotic spindle orientation, with implications for development and tissue homeostasis.
Published in
Hedgehog signaling controls astral microtubules and mitotic spindle orientation in neural progenitors and iPSCs
Liu F, Medyukhina A, Olesen KM et al. · Frontiers in cell and developmental biology 2025 · PMID 40546321 · doi:10.3389/fcell.2025.1582924
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE296672_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1260493 and SRA study SRP583922. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
4 × DMSO vs 4 × SAG vs 4 × SAG + Forskolin

Supports a between-group comparison across 12 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 12 sample titles; they account for 12 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.