A machine learning framework to predict cancer metabolomics from gene-expression data
RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 15 samples
- What it is
- RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
- Organism
- Homo sapiens (human)
- Samples
- 15 samples: 5 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
- Data you can get
- A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Read the full summary ↓
Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.
Processed table
The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.
Supplementary files
The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE299429_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).
Raw sequencing reads
The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.
What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.
Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1274415 and SRA study SRP591042. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.
Supports a between-group comparison across 15 samples.
How we read this: 5 replicated groups read from 15 sample titles; they account for 15 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.
- GSM9039104 MCF7_WT_1 MCF7_WT
- GSM9039105 MCF7_WT_2 MCF7_WT
- GSM9039106 MCF7_WT_3 MCF7_WT
- GSM9039107 MCF7_MUT_1 MCF7_MUT
- GSM9039108 MCF7_MUT_2 MCF7_MUT
- GSM9039109 MCF7_MUT_3 MCF7_MUT
- GSM9039110 MCF10A_WT_1 MCF10A_WT
- GSM9039111 MCF10A_WT_2 MCF10A_WT
- GSM9039112 MCF10A_WT_3 MCF10A_WT
- GSM9039113 MCF10A_E545K_1 MCF10A_E545K
- GSM9039114 MCF10A_E545K_2 MCF10A_E545K
- GSM9039115 MCF10A_E545K_3 MCF10A_E545K
- GSM9039116 MCF10A_H1047R_1 MCF10A_H1047
- GSM9039117 MCF10A_H1047R_2 MCF10A_H1047
- GSM9039118 MCF10A_H1047R_3 MCF10A_H1047
- GSE288490 SLIDE analysis of the scRNA-seq data using an interpretable factor-analysis machine learning framework, that moves beyond predictive biomarkers to try and infer latent factors underlying LS pathophysiology. 16 samples shares framework, learning, machine, predict
- GSE203071 Machine-learning detects non-invasive 5-hydroxymeythylcytosine biomarkers for predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer 155 samples shares learning, machine, predict
- GSE289786 Improved Prediction of Venetoclax and Azacitidine Efficacy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia through Machine Learning [AML patients] 142 samples shares learning, machine, predict
- GSE314132 Early multi-omic signatures and machine learning models predict cardiomyocyte differentiation efficiency and enable robust hPSC differentiation to cardiomyocytes 80 samples shares learning, machine, predict
- GSE301692 Global transcriptional profiles of hiPSC-derived hypothalamus-pituitary organoids predicted to fail or succeed by machine learning model 16 samples shares learning, machine, predict
- GSE252529 Establishment of interpretable cytotoxicity prediction models using machine learning analysis of transcriptome features 15 samples shares learning, machine, predict
- GSE289785 Improved Prediction of Venetoclax and Azacitidine Efficacy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia through Machine Learning 12 samples shares learning, machine, predict
- GSE296948 Application of machine learning (ML) / deep learning (DL) using multiple epigenetic features reveals H3K27Ac as driver of gene expression prediction across patients with glioblastoma 11 samples shares learning, machine, predict
Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.