← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Lung NR3C1+ and CXCR6 High CD4 T cells distinguish immunopathogenesis of human emphysema

GSE302339 Homo sapiens (human) Single-cell RNA-seq 67 samples Submitted 2025/11/13 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

Single-cell RNA-seq · human · 67 samples

What it is
Single-cell RNA-seqGene activity measured in thousands of individual cells, so cell types can be told apart. Read from the summary: GEO's own type field only says 'expression profiling by sequencing', so confirm it in the paper.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
67 samples: 67 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Lung NR3C1(+) and CXCR6(high) T cells distinguish immunopathogenesis of human emphysemaCommunications biology · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
There is a significant knowledge gap in how T cells promote emphysema in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA seq) analysis of human samples and relevant clinical data could provide new mechanistic insights into disease pathogenesis. We generated an in-house human lung scRNA seq dataset with extensive disease characteristic annotation and analyzed a second independent scRNA seq dataset to examine the pathophysiological role of T cells in emphysema.
Read the full summary ↓
Comparisons of pulmonary immune landscapes in emphysematous (E)-COPD, non-emphysematous (NE)-COPD, and controls showed positive enrichment of T cells in E-COPD. Pathway analyses identified upregulated inflammatory states in CD4 T cells a distinguishing feature of E-COPD. Compared to controls, glucocorticoid receptor NR3C1 expressing CD4 T cells were enriched in NE-COPD but were reduced in E-COPD. Interactions between macrophages and NR3C1+ CD4 T cell subset via CXCL signaling were strongly predicted in E-COPD but were absent in NE-COPD and controls. The relative abundance of CD4 CXCR6high effector memory T cells positively correlated with preserved lung function in E-COPD but not in NE-COPD. Overall, these findings suggest that NR3C1+ and CXCR6high effector memory subsets of CD4 T cells distinguish the immune-pathophysiological features of emphysema in human lungs. Molecular targeting of relevant T cell subsets in emphysema could provide new therapeutic opportunities.
Published in
Lung NR3C1(+) and CXCR6(high) T cells distinguish immunopathogenesis of human emphysema
Zhang Y, Sauler M, Corry DB et al. · Communications biology 2025 · PMID 40993192 · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08698-1
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE302339_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Single-cell studies usually ship their counts as 10x files (matrix.mtx, barcodes.tsv, features.tsv), an .h5 file, or an .rds / .h5ad object that Seurat or Scanpy can open. Look for those among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1282758 and SRA study SRP594944. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
67 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 67 sample titles: 67 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 27 more — browse all 67 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.