← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Differential infection tolerance mediates sex-biased illness severity in sepsis

GSE303231 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 18 samples Submitted 2025/07/28 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 18 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
18 samples: 18 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Sepsis impacts males and females differently. Males have higher incidence, illness severity and mortality in sepsis than females. In this study, we use mouse models of fecal-induced peritonitis (FIP) to study sex disparities in sepsis. Male mice show higher illness severity, physiological derangement and end-organ dysfunction compared to females.
Read the full summary ↓
Sex-biased outcome was driven by gonadal sex but not chromosome-linked gene effects. The results of this study indicate that male-biased sepsis severity is driven by impaired infection tolerance in males due to sex-biased mechanisms of mitochondrial function. We did not find differences in infection resistance or canonical immune/inflammatory pathways between males and female mice. Here we performed RNA-sequencing on mouse liver hepatocytes of uninfected and septic males and females.
This dataset
Open GSE303231 in finder → Find more mouse RNA-seq datasets →
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

Series matrix ↓
2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE303231_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

All supplementary files ↗ Whole study · RAW.tar ↓
3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

Raw reads on ENA ↗

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1294379 and SRA study SRP602452. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

NCBI GEO page ↗
Study design
18 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 18 sample titles: 18 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.