← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Simplified Molecular Classification of Urothelial Carcinoma via Multi-Omic Profiling: Implications for Precision Therapy

GSE308936 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 45 samples Submitted 2026/03/11 Platform GPL26167
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 45 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Topic
Bladder cancerThis series is part of our curated briefing on it.
Samples
45 samples: 15 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Multi-omic profiling defines three distinct molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma with implications for precision therapyClinical and translational medicine · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a biologically heterogeneous disease and current molecular classification frameworks have limited integration into clinical decision-making. To foster precision oncology in UC, we developed a molecular classification framework of UC applicable to transcriptomic and proteomic data of non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBC), muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and urothelial cancer cell lines.
Read the full summary ↓
Using a whole-transcriptome self-organized map and regularized semi-supervised clustering ofn 4439 bulk NMIBC and MIBC transcriptomes and proteomes, and 33 UC cell lines, we identified three molecular UC clusters. The clusters had distinct signatures of mRNA, proteins, biological processes, metabolism, and essential driver genes. They also differed in prognosis and machine learning-predicted treatment vulnerabilities. High-risk stroma-rich cluster #1 cancers were predicted to respond to selected cytotoxic drugs, ferroptosis inducers, and PARP inhibitors. For the aggressive, fast proliferating and immune-infiltrated cluster #2 tumors with basal/squamous differentiation, cytotoxic agents and EGFR/ERBB- and MEK/ERK-targeting therapy was proposed. Cluster #3 cancers of predominantly luminal papillary phenotype, with scarce stroma and immune infiltration were enriched with NMIBC and low-risk malignancies. For cluster #3 patients, selected epigenetic drugs or EGFR/FGFR inhibitors may pose an attractive treatment option. This molecular taxonomy holds promise as a practical framework for patient stratification and therapeutic guidance in UC. Our molecular classification scheme may facilitate personalized transcriptome- and proteome-based risk assessment and therapy guidance, and the development of new cancer medication.
Published in
Multi-omic profiling defines three distinct molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma with implications for precision therapy
van Creij NCH, Tymoszuk P, Handle F et al. · Clinical and translational medicine 2026 · PMID 41804750 · doi:10.1002/ctm2.70638
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE308936_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1333445 and SRA study SRP625596. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
15 conditions, mostly in triplicate
UMUC3 Control ×3 UMUC3 0.6 µM Neratinib ×3 UMUC3 4 µM Afatinib ×3 UMUC3 2 µM Trametinib ×3 UMUC3 7 µM Erdafitinib ×3 5637 Control ×3 5637 0.6 µM Neratinib ×3 5637 4 µM Afatinib ×3 +7 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 45 samples.

How we read this: 15 replicated groups read from 45 sample titles; they account for 45 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 5 more — browse all 45 samples with per-sample file links →

More Bladder cancer datasets

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.