← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Differential 5-FU responses of crypt-derived organoids embedded in collagen versus Matrigel, and their transcriptomic comparison with villus-derived organoids

GSE310410 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 18 samples Submitted 2026/01/09 Platform GPL34290
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 18 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
18 samples: 6 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Fetal reversion from diverse lineages sustains the intestinal stem cell pool and confers stress resilienceCommunications biology · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
We compared the effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on gene expression profiles of mouse crypt-derived intestinal organoids embedded in either Matrigel (MG) or collagen type I (COL). Distinct sets of genes were upregulated in COL-embedded organoids following 5-FU treatment, suggesting that collagen-based ECM uniquely modulates inflammatory and DNA-damage responses.
Read the full summary ↓
We further compared COL-embedded crypt-derived organoids with COL-embedded villus-derived organoids (V-organoids) and found that their transcriptional profiles were highly similar. These results indicate that collagen embedding promotes the emergence of revival stem cell–like signatures regardless of the cellular origin of the organoids.
Published in
Fetal reversion from diverse lineages sustains the intestinal stem cell pool and confers stress resilience
Kirino S, Uefune F, Miyake K et al. · Communications biology 2026 · PMID 41530496 · doi:10.1038/s42003-026-09533-x
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE310410_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1365904 and SRA study SRP646677. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
6 conditions, mostly in triplicate
MG_Control ×3 MG_5FU ×3 COL_Control ×3 COL_5FU ×3 COL_cWRNE ×3 VIL ×3

Supports a between-group comparison across 18 samples.

How we read this: 6 replicated groups read from 18 sample titles; they account for 18 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.