Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response

An 87 TN external cohort was used for validation. Fuzzy clustering separated TN tumours into three clusters: C1 (22.4%), C2 (44.9%) and C3 (32.7%). C1 patients were older (mean = 64.6 years) than C2 (mean = 56.8 years; P = 0.03) and C3 patients (mean = 51.9 years; P = 0.0004). Histological grade and Nottingham prognostic index were higher in C2 and C3 than in C1 (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Significant event-free survival (EFS) (P = 0.03) was found according to cluster membership: patients belonging to C3 had a better outcome than patients in C1 (P = 0.01) and C2 (P = 0.02). EFS analysis results were confirmed when our cohort was pooled with external cohort (n = 194; P = 0.01). Functional annotation showed that 22% of TN patients were not basal-like (C1). C1 was enriched in luminal subtypes and positive androgen receptor (luminal androgen receptor [LAR]). C2 could be considered as an almost pure basal-like cluster. C3, enriched in basal-like subtypes, but to a lesser extent, included 26% of claudin-low subtypes. Dissection of immune response showed that high immune response (HIR) and low M2-like macrophages were a hallmark of C3, and that these patients had a better EFS than C2 patients, characterized by low immune response (LIR) and high M2-like macrophages: P = 0.02 for our cohort, and P = 0.03 for pooled cohorts. We identified 3 subtypes of TN patients: LAR (22%), basal-like with LIR and high M2-like macrophages (45%) and basal-enriched with HIR and low M2-like macrophages (33%). We pointed out that macrophages and other immune effectors offer a variety of therapeutic targets in breast cancer, and particularly in TN basal-like tumours. Furthermore, we showed that CK5 antibody was better suited than CK5/6 antibody to subtype TN patients.