← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors

GSE10806 Mus musculus (mouse) Expression microarray 11 samples Submitted 2008/06/28 Platform GPL1261
At a glance

Expression microarray · mouse · 11 samples

What it is
Expression microarrayGene activity read on a chip (the older technology that RNA-seq replaced).
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
11 samples: 3 × Embryonic Stem cells sample vs 3 × Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells (Oct4, Klf4) sample vs 3 × Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, Klf4) sampleGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed expression table (series matrix) and the array files, from NCBI.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Reprogramming of somatic cells is a valuable tool to understand the mechanisms of regaining pluripotency and further opens up the possibility of generating patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. Reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells, designated as induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, has been possible with the expression of the transcription factor quartet Oct4 (also known as Pou5f1), Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4.
Read the full summary ↓
Considering that ectopic expression of c-Myc causes tumourigenicity in offspring and retroviruses themselves can cause insertional mutagenesis, the generation of iPS cells with a minimal number of factors may hasten the clinical application of this approach. Here, we show that adult mouse neural stem cells express higher endogenous levels of Sox2 and c-Myc than embryonic stem cells, and that exogenous Oct4 together with either Klf4 or c-Myc are sufficient to generate iPS cells from neural stem cells. These two-factor (2F) iPS cells are similar to embryonic stem cells at the molecular level, contribute to development of the germ line, and form chimeras. We propose that, in inducing pluripotency, the number of reprogramming factors can be reduced when using somatic cells that endogenously express appropriate levels of complementing factors.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need.

All supplementary files ↗
3 · The original raw files

Whole study · RAW.tar

Everything the authors deposited as one archive (GSE10806_RAW.tar), including the raw array or instrument files. Can be large; the picker in step 2 takes just the samples you need.

What the files usually look like: For arrays the series matrix is normally the normalised expression table you want; the raw array files (CEL and similar) are in the RAW.tar.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA107393. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
3 × Embryonic Stem cells sample vs 3 × Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells (Oct4, Klf4) sample vs 3 × Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, Klf4) sample

Supports a between-group comparison across 9 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 11 sample titles; they account for 9 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse microarray datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.