← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Comparing axon regeneration in male and female mice after peripheral nerve injury

GSE172064 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 12 samples Submitted 2024/04/01 Platform GPL19057
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 12 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
12 samples: 3 × Female SNI vs 3 × Female sham vs 3 × Male SNI vs 3 × Male shamGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Comparing axon regeneration in male and female mice after peripheral nerve injuryJournal of neuroscience research · 2021
Summary (written by the submitters)
In the mammalian peripheral nervous system, axon regeneration occurs spontaneously after injury. We compared the transcriptome profile of male and female dorsal root ganglia to examine if injury responses after sciatic nerve injury is sex-dependent.
Published in
Comparing axon regeneration in male and female mice after peripheral nerve injury
Jang EH, Bae YH, Yang EM et al. · Journal of neuroscience research 2021 · PMID 34510521 · doi:10.1002/jnr.24955
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE172064_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA721945 and SRA study SRP314821. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
3 × Female SNI vs 3 × Female sham vs 3 × Male SNI vs 3 × Male sham

Supports a between-group comparison across 12 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 12 sample titles; they account for 12 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.