← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

mRNA, lncRNA and circular RNA expression profiles and ceRNA network construction of granulosa cells in ovarian endometriosis

GSE192636 Homo sapiens (human) Non-coding RNA profiling 10 samples Submitted 2024/12/25 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

Non-coding RNA profiling · human · 10 samples

What it is
Non-coding RNA profilingLevels of RNAs that do not code for proteins, such as miRNA or lncRNA.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
10 samples: 5 × Control, vs 5 × EM,Groups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
RNA sequencing was conducted for RNA expression profiling from GCs of five women with ovarian endometriosis and five with tubal factor infertility. The differential expression of mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs was compared. Then, the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA and circRNA-miRNA-mRNA networks were constructed by co-expressing lncRNA/circRNA and mRNAs.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE192636_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA792550 and SRA study SRP352556. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
5 × Control, vs 5 × EM,

Supports a between-group comparison across 10 samples.

How we read this: 2 replicated groups read from 10 sample titles; they account for 10 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.