← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Patient-derived organoids of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma for subtype determination and clinical outcome prediction

GSE228801 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 14 samples Submitted 2024/04/11 Platform GPL18573
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 14 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Topic
Pancreatic cancerThis series is part of our curated briefing on it.
Samples
14 samples: 11 × PDAC organoids from patient vs 3 × PDAC original sample from patientGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Patient-derived organoids of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma for subtype determination and clinical outcome predictionJournal of gastroenterology · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Two molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been proposed: the “Classical” and “Basal-like” subtypes. However, the “molecular” classification has not been applied in real-world clinical practice. This study aimed to establish patient-derived organoids (PDOs) for PDAC and evaluate their application in subtype classification and clinical outcome prediction.
Read the full summary ↓
We constructed a PDO library for morphologic and RNA-seq analyses and drug response assays in vitro. PDOs of PDAC were established at a high efficiency (> 70%) with at least 100,000 live cells. Morphologically, PDOs were classified as gland-like structures (GL type) or densely proliferating inside (DP type). RNA-seq analysis revealed that the “morphological” subtype (GL vs. DP) roughly corresponded to the “molecular” subtype (“Classical” vs. “Basal-like”). The proposed “morphological” classification predicted clinical treatment response and prognosis; the median overall survival of patients with GL type were significantly longer than that of those with DP type (P < 0.005). The GL type showed a better response to gemcitabine than the DP type in vitro, whereas the drug response of the DP type was improved by the combination of ERK and autophagy inhibition. PDAC PDOs facilitated subtype determination and clinical outcome prediction, thereby advancing precision medicine for PDAC.
Published in
Patient-derived organoids of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma for subtype determination and clinical outcome prediction
Matsumoto K, Fujimori N, Ichihara K et al. · Journal of gastroenterology 2024 · PMID 38684511 · doi:10.1007/s00535-024-02103-0
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE228801_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA951666 and SRA study SRP430633. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
11 × PDAC organoids from patient vs 3 × PDAC original sample from patient

Supports a between-group comparison across 14 samples.

How we read this: 2 replicated groups read from 14 sample titles; they account for 14 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
More Pancreatic cancer datasets

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.