← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

The impact of ART-relevant in vitro maturation on active translation in oocytes and zygotes

GSE241633 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 40 samples Submitted 2024/09/01 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 40 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
40 samples: 40 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has become an indispensable tool in fertility treatment. Most ART patients respond normally to controlled ovarian stimulation, however some may benefit from the alternative method of oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM), recognized but still underdeveloped method with limited results. As oocytes undergo the transcriptionally silent phase of meiosis, protein synthesis is an important regulator of oocyte development. Here, we have modelled and compared the clinically relevant IVM simulation with in vivo conditions in mouse oocytes and zygotes.
This dataset
Open GSE241633 in finder → Find more mouse RNA-seq datasets →
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

Series matrix ↓
2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE241633_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

All supplementary files ↗ Whole study · RAW.tar ↓
3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

Raw reads on ENA ↗

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1009017. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

NCBI GEO page ↗
Study design
40 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 40 sample titles: 40 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.