← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Effect of SWI/SNF pertubations on chromatin accessibility during macrophage inflammatory activation [ATAC-seq]

GSE242799 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 40 samples Submitted 2024/06/05 Platform GPL19057
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 40 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
40 samples: 40 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
To understand how macrophage chromatin respond to LipidA stimulation, we profiled accessibility for WT BMDMs with 0hr, 1hr, or 4hr LipidA stimulation. In addition, we also profiled accessibility for WT BMDMs treated with ACBI1, BRM014, BRDK98, or dBrd9 and for Arid1A-/- Pbrm1-/- BMDMs after 0hr, 1hr, or 4hr LipidA stimulation.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE242799_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1014766 and SRA study SRP459486. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
40 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Supports a case/control comparison: 18 samples read as cases, 19 as controls.

How we read this: Read from 40 sample titles: 40 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.