← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Comparison of two materials effection on mice bone marrow mononuclear cells and cardiac repairing

GSE250573 Mus musculus Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing 6 samples Submitted 2024/06/20 Platform GPL17021
Summary
Biomaterials can improve cardiac repair combined with transplantation of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs). In this study, we compare the phenotype and cardiac repair between human heart valve-derived scaffold (hHVS) and nature protein/polycaprolactone (NP/PCL) anchored BMNNCs. Methods and Results: BMMNCs were obtained from mice five days following myocardial infarction. Subsequently, BMMNCs were separately cultured on hHVS and PCL. Proliferation and cardiomyogenic differentiation were detected in vitro. Cardiac function was measured after transplantation of cell-seeded cardiac patch on MI mice. After that, the BMMNCs were collected for mRNA sequencing after culturing on the scaffolds. Upon anchoring onto hHVS or PCL, BMMNCs exhibited an increased capacity for proliferation in vitro, however, the cells on hHVS exhibited superior ability cardiomyogenic differentiation ability. Moreover, both BMMNCs-seeded biomaterials effectively improved cardiac function after 4 weeks of transplantation, with reduced infarction area and restricted LV remodeling. Cell-seeded hHVS was superior to cell-seeded PCL. Conclusion: BMMNCs on hHVS show better capacity in both cell cardiac repairing and improvement for cardiac function than on PCL. Compared with seeded onto PCL, BMMNCs on hHVS have 253 genes up regulated and 189 genes down regulated. The reason of hHVS is better than PCL for a scaffold for BMMNCs might be the optimized method of decellularization let more cytokines in ECM retained.
Published in
Effect of human heart valve-derived ECM and NP/PCL electrospun nanofibrous sheet on mice bone marrow mononuclear cells and cardiac repair
Chen Y, Huang Z, Ji C et al. · Heliyon 2024 · PMID 38873676 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31821
This dataset
Download

Direct links to NCBI, no account and no request form: the whole study as GSE250573_RAW.tar, processed values as the series matrix, the supplementary file directory, and per-sample supplementary files for any of the 6 samples. Raw sequencing reads are also available from ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1054560 and SRA study SRP479057. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Samples in this study

The sample list for this study is not cached yet. Press Sort into groups and it will be fetched from NCBI.

+ 6 more — browse all 6 samples with per-sample file links →

Similar datasets

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.