← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

CUT&TAG analysis of R-loops in Mcm8 knockout MEFs and CUT&TAG analysis of R-loops and MCM8-binding sites in HEK293 cells

GSE254352 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 9 samples Submitted 2024/05/30 Platform GPL24676Platform GPL24247
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 9 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
9 samples: 9 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
MCM8 interacts with DDX5 to promote R-loop resolutionThe EMBO journal · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
To reveal the role of MCM8 in suppressing R-loop accumulation, we performed the CUT&TAG assay using the S9.6 antibody to map genome-wide R-loops in Mcm8 wildtype MEFs and Mcm8 knockout MEFs. We also conducted the CUT&TAG assay to detect genome-wide R-loops in Ddx5 downregulated MEFs by adenovirus infection and in control MEFs. To investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of MCM8 suppressing R-loops, we conducted the DNA sequencing of libraries from CUT&TAG assay using the antibody against FLAG in HEK293 cells transfected with FLAG-MCM8 plasmid and using the S9.6 antibody in HEK293 cells.
Read the full summary ↓
Besides, an IgG control and control of RNH1 overexpression were included.
Published in
MCM8 interacts with DDX5 to promote R-loop resolution
Wen C, Cao L, Wang S et al. · The EMBO journal 2024 · PMID 38858601 · doi:10.1038/s44318-024-00134-0
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE254352_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1070001 and SRA study SRP486314. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
9 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 9 sample titles: 9 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.