← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Histone marks identify novel transcription factors that parse CAR-T cell subset-of-origin, clinical potential and expansion [RNA-seq]

GSE254808 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 18 samples Submitted 2024/08/04 Platform GPL16791
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 18 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
18 samples: 6 × RNA_CM_HD vs 6 × RNA_EM_HD vs 6 × RNA_N_HDGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Histone marks identify novel transcription factors that parse CAR-T subset-of-origin, clinical potential and expansionNature communications · 2024
Summary (written by the submitters)
Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of blood cancers. Parsing the genetic underpinnings of T cell precursor quality and subsequent CAR-T efficacy is challenging. RNA-seq informs infused CAR-T state, but the nature of dynamic transcription during activation hinders identification of transiently or minimally expressed genes, such as transcription factors, and over-emphasizes effector and metabolism genes.
Read the full summary ↓
We investigated whether analyses of transcriptionally repressive and permissive histone methylation marks reveal associations with CAR-T potential beyond what is seen by transcriptomic analysis. We assessed human CD8+ T cell naïve, central and effector memory subsets that form the substrate of CAR-T cell products, and CAR-T cells derived from these subsets. We extended these observations into the clinic, by examining CAR-T products from a clinical trial of lymphoma patients (NCT01865617). We report that histone marks provide a rich dataset for identification of genes not apparent by conventional transcriptomics. Histone marks improved identification of T cell subsets, CAR-T manufactured from these subsets, and CAR-T manufactured from central memory cells from healthy donors and patients. Using this discriminative approach, we controlled for clinical factors and identified a factor, KLF7, associated with CAR-T cell expansion in patients. Epigenomic methods are an orthogonal, robust and wide-reaching approach for the assessment of T cell immunotherapeutic quality.
Published in
Histone marks identify novel transcription factors that parse CAR-T subset-of-origin, clinical potential and expansion
Fiorenza S, Zheng Y, Purushe J et al. · Nature communications 2024 · PMID 39333103 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52503-2
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE254808_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1071987 and SRA study SRP487375. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
6 × RNA_CM_HD vs 6 × RNA_EM_HD vs 6 × RNA_N_HD

Supports a between-group comparison across 18 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 18 sample titles; they account for 18 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.