← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Multiomic Analyses Reveal New Targets of Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 in Schwann Lineage Cells and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors - ChIPseq

GSE263109 Homo sapiens (human) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 48 samples Submitted 2024/04/03 Platform GPL24676
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · human · 48 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
48 samples: 48 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Background Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) can arise from atypical neurofibromas (ANF). Loss of the polycomb repressor complex 2 (PRC2) is a common event. Previous studies on PRC2-regulated genes in MPNST used genetic addback experiments in highly aneuploid MPNST cell lines which may miss PRC2-regulated genes in NF1-mutant ANF-like precursor cells.
Read the full summary ↓
A set of PRC2-regulated genes in human Schwann cells has not been defined. We hypothesized PRC2 loss has direct and indirect effects on gene expression resulting in MPNST, so we sought PRC2-regulated genes in immortalized human Schwann cells (iHSCs). Methods We engineered NF1-deficient iHSCs with loss of function SUZ12 or EED mutations. RNA sequencing revealed 1,327 differentially expressed genes to define PRC2-regulated genes. To investigate MPNST pathogenesis we compared genes in iHSCs to consistent gene expression differences between ANF and MPNSTs. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing was used to further define targets. Methylome and proteomic analyses were performed to further identify enriched pathways. Results We identified potential PRC2-regulated drivers of MPNST progression. Pathway analysis indicates many upregulated cancer-related pathways. We found transcriptional evidence for activated Notch and Sonic Hedgehog signaling in PRC2-deficient iHSCs. Functional studies confirm Notch signaling is active in MPNST cell lines, patient derived xenografts, and transient cell models of PRC2 deficiency. A combination of MEK and γ-secretase inhibition shows synergy in MPNST cell lines. Conclusions We report PRC2-regulated genes and potential drivers of MPNSTs. Our findings support the Notch pathway as a druggable target in MPNSTs. Our identification of PRC2-regulated genes and pathways could result in more novel therapeutic approaches.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE263109_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1096051 and SRA study SRP499624. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
48 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 48 sample titles: 48 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 8 more — browse all 48 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.