← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Chromatin site specific accessibility: a microtopography regulated door into the stem cell fate [Hi-C]

GSE263530 Mus musculus (mouse) Other 3 samples Submitted 2024/12/25 Platform GPL21273
At a glance

mouse · 3 samples

Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
3 samples: 3 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Biomaterials engineered to mimic extracellular matrix (ECM) topography play a pivotal role in tissue engineering. Previous research indicates that certain biomimetic topographies can guide stem cells towards multiple specific lineages. However, the mechanisms by which these topographic cues prime the multilineage differentiation remain largely elusive.
Read the full summary ↓
In this study, we show that topography influences nuclear tension in MSCs through a mechanotransductive feedback mechanism, which in turn reshapes chromatin accessibility patterns, finally determines the stem cell lineage commitment. When cultured on an aligned substrate, MSCs show high cytoskeletal tension along the fibre direction, resulting in anisotropic nucleus tensile stress. This further leads to the opening of chromatin sites related to neurogenic, myogenic, and tenogenic genes by the regulation of transcription factors such as TLX. On the other hand, when MSCs are lied on a random substrate, they experience isotropic nucleus stress, leading to the opening of chromatin sites related to osteogenic and chondrogenic genes through the regulation of RUNX family transcription factors. Collectively, our results show that aligned and random topography induce site specific chromatin stretching and lineage specific gene expressing in MSCs, leading to their priming for specific lineages. Our study thus proposes a novel concept for topographic cues influencing on cell behavior and fate during tissue reconstitution and regeneration.
This dataset
Open GSE263530 in finder → Find more mouse datasets →
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

Series matrix ↓
2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need.

All supplementary files ↗
3 · The original raw files

Whole study · RAW.tar

Everything the authors deposited as one archive (GSE263530_RAW.tar), including the raw array or instrument files. Can be large; the picker in step 2 takes just the samples you need.

Whole study · RAW.tar ↓

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1097990. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

NCBI GEO page ↗
Study design
3 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 3 sample titles: 3 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.