← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Effects at the transcriptomic level after knockout of Eed, Ezh2, Brd8 or Nr6a1 in spinal cord neural progenitor differentiation [bulkRNAseq]

GSE264171 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 41 samples Submitted 2024/04/22 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 41 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
41 samples: 15 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
The vertebrate neural tube generates a large diversity of molecularly and functionally distinct neurons and glia from a small progenitor pool. While the role of spatial patterning in organising cell fate specification has been extensively studied, temporal patterning, which controls the timing of cell type generation, is equally important.
Read the full summary ↓
Here we define a global temporal programme in the spinal cord. This governs cell fate choices by regulating chromatin accessibility in neural progenitors. Perturbation of this cis-regulatory programme affects sequential transitions in spinal cord progenitors and the identity of progeny. The temporal programme operates in parallel to spatial patterning, ensuring the timely availability of regulatory elements for spatial determinants to direct cell-type specific gene expression. These findings identify a chronotopic spatiotemporal integration strategy in which a global temporal chromatin programme determines the output of a spatial gene regulatory network resulting in the temporally and spatially ordered allocation of cell type identity.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE264171_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1101108 and SRA study SRP502156. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
15 conditions, mostly in triplicate
D07_Brd8 ×3 D07_Eed ×3 D07_Ezh2 ×3 D07_NT ×3 D09_Eed ×3 D09_Ezh2 ×3 D09_NT ×3 D11_Brd8 ×3 +7 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 41 samples.

How we read this: 15 replicated groups read from 41 sample titles; they account for 41 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 1 more — browse all 41 samples with per-sample file links →

Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.