← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Targeting NTRK1 Enhances Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy in NTRK1 Wild-type Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

GSE274960 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 19 samples Submitted 2024/08/20 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 19 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
19 samples: 6 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has drastically changed in recent years owing to the robust anti-cancer effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, only 20% of NSCLC patients benefit from ICIs, highlighting the need to uncover the mechanisms mediating resistance.
Read the full summary ↓
By analyzing the overall survival (OS) and mutational profiles of 424 NSCLC patients who received ICI treatments between 2015 and 2021, we determined that patients carrying a loss of function mutation in neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 1 (NTRK1) had a prolonged OS compared to patients with wild-type NTRK1. Notably, suppression of the NTRK1 pathway by knockdown or Entrectinib treatment significantly enhanced ICI efficacy in mouse NSCLC models. RNA sequencing of tumors and NTRK1 knockdown cell lines were performed to demonstrates the role for NTRK1 signaling.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE274960_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1148643 and SRA study SRP526683. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
6 conditions, mostly in triplicate
LL2_E_PD ×4 LL2_IgG ×3 LL2_E ×3 LL2_PD ×3 LL2_CNTRL ×3 LL2_shNTRK ×3

Supports a between-group comparison across 19 samples.

How we read this: 6 replicated groups read from 19 sample titles; they account for 19 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.