← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

TUT1 and USB1, the biogenesis enzymes for 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate modification at U6 snRNA 3’ end, have distinct roles in mammalian development [RNA-seq]

GSE277835 Mus musculus (mouse) Single-nucleus RNA-seq 17 samples Submitted 2026/06/03 Platform GPL13112
At a glance

Single-nucleus RNA-seq · mouse · 17 samples

What it is
Single-nucleus RNA-seqGene activity measured in individual nuclei (used when whole cells are hard to isolate, for example from frozen tissue).
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
17 samples: 6 conditions, mostly in triplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
TUT1-catalyzed U6 snRNA 3'-end maturation is essential for RNA splicing and stem cell survivalEMBO reports · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
The 3’ end of most cellular U6 snRNA has a 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate group, a post-transcriptional modification thought to be essential for proper RNA splicing and cellular function. Recent studies have established that the biogenesis of 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate requires two enzymes: first TUT1 adds a poly(U) tail to the 3’ end of U6 snRNA, followed by USB1-catalyzed trimming of the poly(U) tail.
Read the full summary ↓
Here, we use nine genetically engineered mouse models of Tut1 and Usb1 to show that, contrary to what was previously believed, Usb1 and thus 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate is dispensable for intra-embryonic cell lineages. We find that Tut1, but not Usb1, is essential for the maintenance of the epiblast and neural stem cells. Loss of Tut1 causes defective RNA splicing, triggering massive DNA damage and subsequent cell death. In contrast, loss of Usb1 primarily damages endothelial cells of the extra-embryonic vasculature in the yolk sac by both cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms, leading to fetal growth restriction. These results demonstrate that TUT1-catalyzed U6 snRNA 3’ end oligouridylation, rather than 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate as previously thought, is required for proper RNA splicing. Further studies are warranted to elucidate how these different post-transcriptional modifications regulate the function of U6 snRNA in RNA splicing in development and disease.
Published in
TUT1-catalyzed U6 snRNA 3'-end maturation is essential for RNA splicing and stem cell survival
Fang Y, Qiu T, Luo H et al. · EMBO reports 2026 · PMID 41957187 · doi:10.1038/s44319-026-00759-8
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE277835_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Single-cell studies usually ship their counts as 10x files (matrix.mtx, barcodes.tsv, features.tsv), an .h5 file, or an .rds / .h5ad object that Seurat or Scanpy can open. Look for those among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1166219 and SRA study SRP535373. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
6 conditions, mostly in triplicate
R1 cell, Usb1-KO, Day 0 repeat ×3 R1 cell, WT, Day 1 repeat ×3 R1 cell, Usb1-KO, Day 1 repeat ×3 R1 cell, WT, Day 3 repeat ×3 R1 cell, Usb1-KO, Day 3 repeat ×3 R1 cell, WT, Day 0 repeat ×2

Supports a between-group comparison across 17 samples.

How we read this: 6 replicated groups read from 17 sample titles; they account for 17 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.