← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Lipid nanoparticles as a tool to dissect dendritic cell maturation pathways

GSE279232 Mus musculus (mouse) Single-cell RNA-seq 27 samples Submitted 2025/07/01 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

Single-cell RNA-seq · mouse · 27 samples

What it is
Single-cell RNA-seqGene activity measured in thousands of individual cells, so cell types can be told apart. Read from the summary: GEO's own type field only says 'expression profiling by sequencing', so confirm it in the paper.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
27 samples: 27 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Lipid nanoparticles as a tool to dissect dendritic cell maturation pathwaysCell reports · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Dendritic cells (DCs) are short-lived immune cells that continuously roam our body in search for foreign or self-antigens. Upon acquisition of antigen, they mature and start migrating to the lymph node to present the antigen to naïve T cells. Depending on the context wherein the antigen is acquired, DCs will mature in a homeostatic or immunogenic manner.
Read the full summary ↓
So far, the field is lacking proper tools to distinguish between the two maturation states. Most maturation markers are shared between the two states and therefore inappropriate to use. Still, defining the proper maturation type is crucial as it determines how the DCs will instruct the T cells towards antigen expressing cells. In this study, we used a lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-based approach to steer DC maturation pathways in vivo. CITE-seq analysis allowed us to design a panel of flow cytometry markers that reliably annotates the two DC maturation states, as validated in an infection and in a tumor model. Furthermore, the data corroborated that uptake of empty LNPs in DCs induces their homeostatic maturation, in contrast to uptake of mRNA-LNPs or TLR ligand-adjuvanted LNPs, leading to distinct effector T cell outputs. This reveals that LNPs themselves are not being decoded as “danger” by cDC1s, and that the cargo is essential to provide adjuvants activity, which is highly relevant for targeted design of LNP-based therapies.
Published in
Lipid nanoparticles as a tool to dissect dendritic cell maturation pathways
Rennen S, Bosteels V, De Nolf C et al. · Cell reports 2025 · PMID 40828654 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116150
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE279232_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Single-cell studies usually ship their counts as 10x files (matrix.mtx, barcodes.tsv, features.tsv), an .h5 file, or an .rds / .h5ad object that Seurat or Scanpy can open. Look for those among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1171441 and SRA study SRP539516. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
27 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Any grouping that defines a comparison lives in the sample characteristics, which GEO records separately from the titles.

How we read this: Read from 27 sample titles: 27 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.