← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Disordered maturation of mitochondrial matrix proteins in adipose tissue leads to local and systemic metabolic and inflammatory derangements in adipocyte-specific Mipep knockout mice

GSE282147 Mus musculus (mouse) RNA-seq (gene expression) 16 samples Submitted 2025/04/23 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · mouse · 16 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
16 samples: 4 × WAT_contorol vs 4 × WAT_aMKO vs 4 × BAT_contorol vs 4 × BAT_aMKOGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Mipep deficiency in adipocytes impairs mitochondrial protein maturation and leads to systemic inflammation and metabolic dysfunctionsScientific reports · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Most mitochondrial matrix proteins encoded in the nuclear genome are synthesized in the cytoplasm. These proteins subsequently undergo maturation through the cleavage of a signal sequence at the N-terminus by one or two mitochondrial signal peptidases, which is essential for their function within mitochondria. The present study demonstrates that adipocyte-specific knockout of one mitochondrial signal peptidase, mitochondrial intermediate peptidase (MIPEP), resulted in disordered mitochondrial proteostasis of MIPEP substrate proteins and their defective maturation.
Read the full summary ↓
MIPEP deficiency in white and brown adipocytes suppressed the expression of adipocyte differentiation, lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial biogenesis genes. These alterations led to lipoatrophy in white adipose tissue and the whitening of brown adipose tissue. Additionally, it induced an atypical mitochondrial unfolded protein response and local inflammation in white and brown adipose tissue. Furthermore, it induced fatty liver and splenomegaly and caused systemic impairments in glucose metabolism and inflammation. These findings indicate that maturation defects of certain mitochondrial matrix proteins and subsequent proteostasis disorders in white and brown adipocytes cause chronic and systemic inflammatory and metabolic derangements.
Published in
Mipep deficiency in adipocytes impairs mitochondrial protein maturation and leads to systemic inflammation and metabolic dysfunctions
Nozaki Y, Kobayashi M, Fukuoh T et al. · Scientific reports 2025 · PMID 40229443 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-97307-6
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE282147_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1187468 and SRA study SRP545826. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
4 × WAT_contorol vs 4 × WAT_aMKO vs 4 × BAT_contorol vs 4 × BAT_aMKO

Supports a between-group comparison across 16 samples.

How we read this: 4 replicated groups read from 16 sample titles; they account for 16 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.