← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Analysis of chromatin accessibility relative to epigenetic features of azacitidine response in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

GSE291718 Homo sapiens (human) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 56 samples Submitted 2025/07/10 Platform GPL24676Platform GPL34281
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · human · 56 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Topic
Myelodysplastic syndromesThis series is part of our curated briefing on it.
Samples
56 samples: 56 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groupsGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Analysis of chromatin accessibility associated with azacitidine response in higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasmsiScience · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Azacitidine is used to treat patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, which alters epigenetic regulatory program that changes global gene expression by inhibiting DNA methylation. However, epigenomic factors affecting azacitidine response have not been studied in the context of chromatin. The efficacy of the hypomethylating agent differs by patient, leaving approximately 40% of patients fail to respond.
Read the full summary ↓
Here, we demonstrate that chromatin accessibility features in patient-derived bone marrow cells can distinguish azacitidine responders from non-responders before treatment. Profiling chromatin accessibility from 23 high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients discovered that treatment response is strongly associated with distinct hematopoietic cell states. While non-responders showed enrichment of myeloid progenitor signatures, responders were characterized by elevated T cell populations. Notably, CD8+ T cells from non-responders exhibited selective loss of chromatin accessibility at TBX/EOMES binding sites, revealing a previously unrecognized link between T cell differentiation state and azacitidine response. These findings suggest the importance of immune cell differentiation and their activity in hypomethylating agent response for myelodysplastic syndromes, providing insights for patient stratification and treatment optimization based on the chromatin accessibility in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients.
Published in
Analysis of chromatin accessibility associated with azacitidine response in higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms
Kim D, Park S, Kwon YR et al. · iScience 2025 · PMID 40894874 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113297
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE291718_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1235117. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
56 samples, each with a distinct title — no replicated groups

Supports a case/control comparison: 50 samples read as cases, 6 as controls.

How we read this: Read from 56 sample titles: 56 distinct titles with little repetition. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study

+ 16 more — browse all 56 samples with per-sample file links →

More Myelodysplastic syndromes datasets

Search all human ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.