← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Genomic and Behavioral Signatures of Selection for Ethanol Preference from the Heterogeneous Stock Collaborative Cross Mice – The Central Nucleus of the Amygdala II

GSE293636 Mus musculus (mouse) ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) 32 samples Submitted 2025/07/23 Platform GPL24247
At a glance

ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin) · mouse · 32 samples

What it is
ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq (genome binding and open chromatin)Where proteins bind the genome, or which regions are open and active.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
32 samples: 16 × snATAC-Seq of CeA tissue from Mouse vs 16 × snRNA-Seq of CeA tissue from MouseGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Genomic and Behavioral Signatures of Selection for Ethanol Preference from the Heterogeneous Stock Collaborative Cross Mice - The Central Nucleus of the AmygdalaAddiction neuroscience · 2025
Summary (written by the submitters)
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a complex disease with heritability of ~0.5, indicating genetic and non-genetic factors contribute to risk. Identifying gene expression networks contributing to risk using post-mortem human brain tissue has the limitation of conflating risk for AUD with consequences of alcohol use. We leveraged mice selectively bred for differential ethanol preference from a highly genetically diverse population to overcome this limitation.
Read the full summary ↓
Ethanol intake was highly correlated with preference, high-preferring (HP) mice consumed more sweet- but not bitter-tasting solutions compared to low-preferring (LP) mice, and the lines did not differ in rate of ethanol elimination. Adult, ethanol-naïve HP and LP mice contributed tissue from the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), a region critical to ethanol preference and intake. Single-nuclei and bulk RNA sequencing data were used to identify cell types and transcriptome changes related to selective breeding for differential risk for ethanol preference. Single nuclei analysis identified populations of inhibitory (~48% of cells) and excitatory (~23%) neurons, and non-neuronal (~29%) cells, but no differences in cell-type composition or gene expression were identified between the lines. Bulk CeA analysis identified differences between the lines for: (1) gene expression (2996 genes), (2) expression variability (426 genes), and (3) wiring (407 significant gene-gene correlations). Overall, lower variance was found in the HP line. Reduced gene-gene correlation, also found in HP mice, suggested that selection for high preference induced changes in transcriptional regulation resulting in reduced connectivity, specific to gene networks enriched in markers for inhibitory neurons expressing Isl1 and Tac1.
Published in
Genomic and Behavioral Signatures of Selection for Ethanol Preference from the Heterogeneous Stock Collaborative Cross Mice - The Central Nucleus of the Amygdala
Anderson JQ, Darakjian P, Hitzemann R et al. · Addiction neuroscience 2025 · PMID 40693020 · doi:10.1016/j.addicn.2025.100209
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE293636_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for peak files (.bed, .narrowPeak) and signal tracks (.bigWig) among the supplementary files; the raw reads are on ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1245407 and SRA study SRP576065. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
16 × snATAC-Seq of CeA tissue from Mouse vs 16 × snRNA-Seq of CeA tissue from Mouse

Supports a between-group comparison across 32 samples.

How we read this: 2 replicated groups read from 32 sample titles; they account for 32 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.