← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Heterozygous Kmt2d loss diminishes enhancers to render medulloblastoma cells vulnerable to combinatory inhibition of lysine demethylation and oxidative phosphorylation [RNA-seq]

GSE293811 Mus musculus (mouse) DNA methylation 10 samples Submitted 2025/06/02 Platform GPL19057
At a glance

DNA methylation · mouse · 10 samples

What it is
DNA methylationChemical marks on DNA that help switch genes on or off.
Organism
Mus musculus (mouse)
Samples
10 samples: 4 × Ptch, Cerebellum, Control, RNA-seq, vs 3 × NKP, Medulloblastoma, KO, RNA-seq, vs 3 × AKP, Medulloblastoma, KO, RNA-seq,Groups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Summary (written by the submitters)
The histone methyltransferase KMT2D (alias MLL4) is frequently mutated in medulloblastoma (MB). Heterozygous loss of KMT2D is prevalent in MB. However, the role of heterozygous KMT2D loss remains unknown. Here, we show that heterozygous Kmt2d loss highly promotes Ptch+/–-driven MB genesis in mice. Heterozygous Kmt2d loss upregulated tumor-promoting programs, including oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), in Ptch+/–-driven MB genesis.
Read the full summary ↓
Heterozygous Kmt2d loss extensively diminished enhancer signals and H3K4me3 signature, including those for transcription-repressive tumor suppressor genes (e.g., Ncor2). NCOR2 repressed the expression of tumor-promoting genes. Combinatory pharmacological inhibition of OXPHOS and the enhancer-decommissioning demethylase LSD1 drastically reduced the tumorigenicity of MB cells bearing heterozygous Kmt2d loss. These findings reveal the mechanistic basis underlying the MB-promoting effect of heterozygous KMT2D loss.
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE293811_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: Look for beta-value tables or raw IDAT files among the supplementary files.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1246494 and SRA study SRP576467. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
4 × Ptch, Cerebellum, Control, RNA-seq, vs 3 × NKP, Medulloblastoma, KO, RNA-seq, vs 3 × AKP, Medulloblastoma, KO, RNA-seq,

Supports a between-group comparison across 10 samples.

How we read this: 3 replicated groups read from 10 sample titles; they account for 10 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all mouse RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.