← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Targeting the ERα DBD-LBD interface with mitoxantrone disrupts receptor function through proteasomal degradation

GSE303561 Homo sapiens (human) RNA-seq (gene expression) 24 samples Submitted 2025/07/24 Platform GPL21697
At a glance

RNA-seq (gene expression) · human · 24 samples

What it is
RNA-seq (gene expression)Gene activity measured by sequencing. The summary does not mention single-cell work, so this is most likely bulk: one average per sample, the usual starting point for comparing groups.
Organism
Homo sapiens (human)
Samples
24 samples: 12 conditions, mostly in duplicateGroups are read from the sample names, not from the paper. Check the list below.
Data you can get
A processed table (series matrix) and supplementary files from NCBI; the raw sequencing reads from ENA. Which of these hold counts depends on the study, so check the file list.
Paper
Targeting the ERα DBD-LBD Interface with Mitoxantrone Disrupts Receptor Function through Proteasomal DegradationMolecular cancer therapeutics · 2026
Summary (written by the submitters)
The estrogen receptor (ER or ERα) remains the primary therapeutic target for luminal breast cancer, with current treatments centered on competitive antagonists, receptor down-regulators, and aromatase inhibitors. This therapeutic landscape frames our discovery of an alternative mechanism of ER inhibition that targets the critical interface between the DNA-binding domain (DBD) and ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the receptor.
Read the full summary ↓
We identified mitoxantrone (MTO), an FDA-approved topoisomerase II inhibitor, as a specific ligand for this previously unexplored DBD-LBD interface. Through integration of computational, biophysical, biochemical, and cellular analyses, we demonstrate that independent of its DNA damage response activity, MTO binding induces ER conformational changes, leading to cytoplasmic redistribution and proteasomal degradation. Notably, MTO also effectively inhibits constitutively active ER mutants (Y537S and D538G) commonly associated with endocrine therapy resistance, suppressing ER/ER-mutant-dependent gene expression and tumor growth more potently than fulvestrant. These findings establish the DBD-LBD interface as a crucial regulatory point for ER function, suggesting a new paradigm for targeting domain interfaces across the nuclear receptor family.
Published in
Targeting the ERα DBD-LBD Interface with Mitoxantrone Disrupts Receptor Function through Proteasomal Degradation
Wang H, Luo Y, Artham S et al. · Molecular cancer therapeutics 2026 · PMID 40931856 · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-25-0405
This dataset
Download · which file do I need?

Direct links to NCBI and ENA, no account and no request form. Pick by what you want to do: take the small processed table to look, the supplementary files to re-analyse, or the original raw data to start over.

1 · Just have a look

Processed table

The series matrix: one table of values per sample as the submitters processed it. The smallest download, and it opens in Excel or R. Start here to see what the data look like.

2 · Re-analyse it

Supplementary files

The count tables and other files the authors uploaded. Take only the samples you need, or the whole study as GSE303561_RAW.tar (it can run to tens of gigabytes).

3 · Start from the raw reads

Raw sequencing reads

The original FASTQ files, straight from the sequencer, held at ENA. Large, and you align them yourself, so only choose this if you need to re-process the study from scratch.

What the files usually look like: For RNA-seq the counts are usually a table among the supplementary files (look for 'counts', 'expression', 'FPKM' or 'TPM' in the file name). The series matrix of a sequencing study is sometimes nearly empty.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1295824 and SRA study SRP603227. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
12 conditions, mostly in duplicate
KI-Ctrl_DMSO ×2 KI-Ctrl_ICI ×2 KI-Ctrl_T4 ×2 KI-Ctrl_combination ×2 KI-537_DMSO ×2 KI-537_ICI ×2 KI-537_T4 ×2 KI-537_combination ×2 +4 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 24 samples.

How we read this: 12 replicated groups read from 24 sample titles; they account for 24 of them. These groups are guessed from the sample names, not taken from the paper, so check them against the sample list below before relying on them.

Samples in this study
Datasets on a similar topic

Search all human RNA-seq datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.