GEO series
Synthetic engineering demonstrates that synergy among enhancers involves an increase in transcriptionally productive enhancer-gene contacts [ChIP-Seq]
GSE306439
Mus musculus
Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing
72 samples
2025/09/02
GPL24247
Summary
Enhancers are non-coding cis-regulatory elements that control the expression of distally located genes in a tissue- and time-specific manner. Recent studies indicate that enhancers can differ in their underlying genetic architecture and regulatory properties. However, these different types of enhancers were previously investigated under rather variable conditions (e.g. model organism, cell type, enhancer-promoter distance, type of target promoter, etc.), thus introducing confounding factors that make it difficult to discern the distinct regulatory properties of each enhancer type. To overcome these limitations, here we generated transgenic mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) lines in which different types of synthetic enhancers (i.e. “typical” enhancer, CTCF-associated enhancer, enhancer cluster/super-enhancer) were built upon the same “core” neural enhancer and inserted at the same distance (i.e. 100 Kb) from a typical developmental gene (i.e. Gata6). Subsequently, the mESC lines were differentiated to systematically compare the regulatory properties of the different enhancer types under identical conditions. Regarding the CTCF-associated enhancer, our data revealed that the addition of a CTCF site to the “core” enhancer increased insulation and led to the formation of a smaller contact domain, while having a rather mild effect on enhancer-promoter contact frequency and target gene expression. On the other hand, in comparison to the “core” enhancer alone, the enhancer cluster synergistically increased target gene expression and burst fraction. Importantly, we found that, in contrast to previous models, the strong regulatory activity of the enhancer cluster can not be explained by changes in enhancer-promoter contact frequency or the formation of transcriptional condensates. Instead, our data suggest that the emergent regulatory properties of enhancer clustering preferentially entail an increase in RNA Polymerase II pause release and, thus, in the fraction of enhancer-promoter contacts that are transcriptionally productive.
Download
NCBI GEO page ↗
{# Names what the click gives you. "Open in finder" meant nothing to a
visitor who arrived from a search engine and has never seen the tool. #}
Find more
mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets →
Similar datasets
- GSE249984 Androgen receptor action in mouse granulosa cells in response to LH surge 14 samples
- GSE339012 Mega-Enhancers Compartmentalize Transcriptionally Active Long Genes in the Brain [ChIP-Seq] 22 samples
- GSE328495 Gene expression + ATAC profiling of trisomic hippocampal neurons upon SAHA treatment [ATAC-seq] 16 samples
- GSE324864 HP1B and H3K9me3 Regulate Olfactory Receptor Choice and 2 Transcriptional Identity [ChIP-seq] 28 samples
- GSE292285 Depletion of lamin-associated polypeptide 2 alpha leads to chromatin reorganization and redistribution of A-type lamins to open genomic regions [ChIP-seq] 22 samples
- GSE306458 ACVR1-mediated glycolytic reprogramming promotes histone lactylation and neuronal pyroptosis in neuropathic pain {ChIP-seq] 12 samples
- GSE306261 Astrocyte glucocorticoid receptor signaling restricts neuronal plasticity [CUT&RUN] 50 samples
- GSE324933 DGCR8 promotes RNA polymerase II pause release independently of DROSHA [ChIP-seq] 32 samples
Share this dataset
Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.